The orchid-bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Acre state (northwestern Brazil) and a re-evaluation of euglossine bait-trapping.

A. Nemésio, E. F. Morato
{"title":"The orchid-bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Acre state (northwestern Brazil) and a re-evaluation of euglossine bait-trapping.","authors":"A. Nemésio, E. F. Morato","doi":"10.35699/2675-5327.2006.22187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Male orchid bees were sampled with chemical baits from May 1996 to March 1998 in two forested areas in the state of Acre, Brazilian Amazonia. The two most used sampling methods in euglossine studies were used simultaneously: insect nets and bait traps. We collected 1,744 euglossine specimens belonging to at least 33 species. Of these, 1,221 were collected with insect nets and 523 in bait traps. Eulaema cingulata (Fabricius) and Eulaema meriana (Olivier) were the commonest species in both the Parque Zoobotânico and the Catuaba Reserve, followed by Euglossa amazonica Dressler, Euglossa ignita Smith, and Euglossa mixta Friese. Due to a combination of ‘dominant species’ and the specific composition of the orchid-bee fauna of the studied areas, the Acrean orchid-bee fauna has shown to be quite different from other areas sampled in Amazonia. As the sampling effort with bait traps was twice as higher as that with insect nets, the efficiency of the insect net method was 4.7 times greater, in average, than that with bait traps. Thirty-two of the 33 species were collected with insect nets, whereas only 24 species were collected with bait traps. The resulting community of orchid bees was also different. The large bees of the genus Eulaema Lepeletier were much more abundant in bait-trap (74% - 79%) than in insect net samples (37% - 39%). The considerable differences in efficiency between insect nets and bait trap collections suggest that the sole use of bait traps should be avoided in orchid bee studies or restricted to situations in which the use of insect nets is impossible. \nKey words: Amazonia, chemical baits, euglossine bees, Hymenoptera, insect nets, Insecta.","PeriodicalId":445542,"journal":{"name":"Lundiana: International Journal of Biodiversity","volume":"360 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lundiana: International Journal of Biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35699/2675-5327.2006.22187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

Male orchid bees were sampled with chemical baits from May 1996 to March 1998 in two forested areas in the state of Acre, Brazilian Amazonia. The two most used sampling methods in euglossine studies were used simultaneously: insect nets and bait traps. We collected 1,744 euglossine specimens belonging to at least 33 species. Of these, 1,221 were collected with insect nets and 523 in bait traps. Eulaema cingulata (Fabricius) and Eulaema meriana (Olivier) were the commonest species in both the Parque Zoobotânico and the Catuaba Reserve, followed by Euglossa amazonica Dressler, Euglossa ignita Smith, and Euglossa mixta Friese. Due to a combination of ‘dominant species’ and the specific composition of the orchid-bee fauna of the studied areas, the Acrean orchid-bee fauna has shown to be quite different from other areas sampled in Amazonia. As the sampling effort with bait traps was twice as higher as that with insect nets, the efficiency of the insect net method was 4.7 times greater, in average, than that with bait traps. Thirty-two of the 33 species were collected with insect nets, whereas only 24 species were collected with bait traps. The resulting community of orchid bees was also different. The large bees of the genus Eulaema Lepeletier were much more abundant in bait-trap (74% - 79%) than in insect net samples (37% - 39%). The considerable differences in efficiency between insect nets and bait trap collections suggest that the sole use of bait traps should be avoided in orchid bee studies or restricted to situations in which the use of insect nets is impossible. Key words: Amazonia, chemical baits, euglossine bees, Hymenoptera, insect nets, Insecta.
巴西西北部阿克里州兰花蜂区系(膜翅目:蜂科)及叶胶诱捕法的再评价。
1996年5月至1998年3月,在巴西亚马孙河流域阿克里州的两个林区用化学诱饵对雄性兰蜂进行了取样。同时采用两种最常用的取样方法:网捕法和诱饵法。本研究共收集了至少33个种的1744份真鲷标本。其中,用蚊帐捕获1221只,用诱捕饵器捕获523只。在Parque zoobotnico和Catuaba保护区最常见的物种是Eulaema cingulata (Fabricius)和Eulaema meriana (Olivier),其次是Euglossa amazonica Dressler、Euglossa ignita Smith和Euglossa mixta Friese。由于“优势种”和研究区域兰花蜂动物群的特殊组成的结合,Acrean兰花蜂动物群显示出与亚马逊其他地区取样的兰花蜂动物群有很大不同。由于诱虫网法的取样工作量是诱虫网法的2倍,因此诱虫网法的平均取样效率是诱虫网法的4.7倍。采用网捕法捕获了33种昆虫中的32种,而诱捕法仅捕获了24种。由此产生的兰花蜂群落也不同。捕蝇器捕获的大蜂数量(74% ~ 79%)远高于网捕的大蜂数量(37% ~ 39%)。由于捕虫网和诱虫网在效率上存在相当大的差异,因此在兰花蜂研究中应避免单独使用诱虫网,或限制在不可能使用诱虫网的情况下使用。关键词:亚马逊,化学诱饵,真光蜂,膜翅目,昆虫网,昆虫科
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信