A six-week study comparing the efficacy of a rotary electric toothbrush with a conventional toothbrush.

Clinical preventive dentistry Pub Date : 1992-03-01
L M Silverstone, T S Tilliss, G N Cross-Poline, E Van der Linden, D J Stach, M J Featherstone
{"title":"A six-week study comparing the efficacy of a rotary electric toothbrush with a conventional toothbrush.","authors":"L M Silverstone,&nbsp;T S Tilliss,&nbsp;G N Cross-Poline,&nbsp;E Van der Linden,&nbsp;D J Stach,&nbsp;M J Featherstone","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rotary electric toothbrush, Rota-dent, is often recommended and used as an alternative to the conventional toothbrush. The purpose of this short-term study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Rota-dent on plaque removal and gingival health in comparison to a conventional toothbrush. Twenty-four subjects were divided into two groups. For 6 weeks one group used the Rota-dent, while the other group used a conventional (Oral-B 40) toothbrush. Plaque and gingival indexes were evaluated each week. Results indicated that the Löe and Silness Gingival Index scores improved significantly for both groups. There was a significant improvement in plaque removal as measured by Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index for the Rota-dent group, while there were no significant differences in the Silness and Löe Plaque Index for either group. Thus, both devices had a positive effect on gingival health, and the Rota-dent removed plaque better than a conventional toothbrush as measured by one but not another plaque index.</p>","PeriodicalId":75715,"journal":{"name":"Clinical preventive dentistry","volume":"14 2","pages":"29-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rotary electric toothbrush, Rota-dent, is often recommended and used as an alternative to the conventional toothbrush. The purpose of this short-term study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Rota-dent on plaque removal and gingival health in comparison to a conventional toothbrush. Twenty-four subjects were divided into two groups. For 6 weeks one group used the Rota-dent, while the other group used a conventional (Oral-B 40) toothbrush. Plaque and gingival indexes were evaluated each week. Results indicated that the Löe and Silness Gingival Index scores improved significantly for both groups. There was a significant improvement in plaque removal as measured by Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index for the Rota-dent group, while there were no significant differences in the Silness and Löe Plaque Index for either group. Thus, both devices had a positive effect on gingival health, and the Rota-dent removed plaque better than a conventional toothbrush as measured by one but not another plaque index.

一项为期六周的研究比较了旋转电动牙刷和传统牙刷的功效。
旋转式电动牙刷,Rota-dent,经常被推荐作为传统牙刷的替代品。这项短期研究的目的是评估与传统牙刷相比,旋转牙槽在清除牙菌斑和牙龈健康方面的有效性。24名受试者被分为两组。在6周的时间里,一组使用Rota-dent,而另一组使用传统的(oral - b40)牙刷。每周评估菌斑和牙龈指数。结果显示,两组患者的Löe和牙龈指数评分均有明显改善。通过对旋转凹痕组的Quigley-Hein斑块指数的Turesky修正测量,斑块去除有显著改善,而两组的Silness和Löe斑块指数没有显著差异。因此,这两种设备对牙龈健康都有积极的影响,并且根据一种而不是另一种牙菌斑指数来衡量,Rota-dent比传统牙刷去除牙菌斑的效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信