Using draft reviews to improve writing and thinking in engineering classes

B. Olds
{"title":"Using draft reviews to improve writing and thinking in engineering classes","authors":"B. Olds","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1994.580648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although faculty-student conferencing on papers and reports is common practice in composition classes, many engineering faculty are reluctant to try it. This paper describes the draft review conferencing process developed in the chemical engineering unit operations field session at the Colorado School of Mines. Since draft reviews were introduced, engineering faculty report improvement in students' writing skills, a dramatic decrease in the amount of time required to grade final reports, and far less frustration with the organisation and technical content of student reports. Students are very satisfied with the draft reviews as well, many of them describing the process as the 'best' aspect of their field session. In this paper the author describes the genesis and implementation of their draft review process, provides an example of such a review, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using draft reviews in engineering classes.","PeriodicalId":288591,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1994.580648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Although faculty-student conferencing on papers and reports is common practice in composition classes, many engineering faculty are reluctant to try it. This paper describes the draft review conferencing process developed in the chemical engineering unit operations field session at the Colorado School of Mines. Since draft reviews were introduced, engineering faculty report improvement in students' writing skills, a dramatic decrease in the amount of time required to grade final reports, and far less frustration with the organisation and technical content of student reports. Students are very satisfied with the draft reviews as well, many of them describing the process as the 'best' aspect of their field session. In this paper the author describes the genesis and implementation of their draft review process, provides an example of such a review, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using draft reviews in engineering classes.
在工程课上使用草稿评审来提高写作和思考能力
尽管在作文课上,师生就论文和报告进行会议是一种常见的做法,但许多工程学院的教师不愿尝试。本文描述了在科罗拉多矿业学院化学工程单元操作现场会议中开发的审查会议草案过程。自从引入草稿审查制度以来,工程学院的学生报告说,他们的写作技巧得到了提高,最终报告评分所需的时间大大减少,学生报告的组织和技术内容也大大减少了挫折感。学生们对初稿审查也非常满意,他们中的许多人将这个过程描述为他们实地学习的“最佳”方面。在本文中,作者描述了他们的草案审查过程的起源和实现,提供了一个这样的审查的例子,并讨论了在工程类中使用草案审查的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信