The Correlation Between the Power Styles Used by Nurse Managers and Bullying Behaviour

Şehrinaz Polat, Betül Sönmez
{"title":"The Correlation Between the Power Styles Used by Nurse Managers and Bullying Behaviour","authors":"Şehrinaz Polat, Betül Sönmez","doi":"10.33844/IJOL.2018.60327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational study was conducted to determine the correlation between the perceptions of nurses about the power styles used by their managers and the bullying behaviours that are exposed to them by their managers.The sample of the study consisted of 822 nurses who worked in a public university hospital in Istanbul and agreed to participate in the study. The nurses who participated in this study evaluated the power styles used by their managers as legitimate power, reinforcing power, and coercive power, respectively. Almost half of the nurses in this study indicated that they were exposed to bullying behaviour by their managers in the last one year. It was found that current reinforcing powers of managers had an inverse effect on being exposed to bullying behaviours, whereas their legitimate and coercive powers (for head nurses) had a significant effect on being exposed to bullying behaviour. The legitimate and coercive power styles were effective in bullying behaviour and supported the presence of power inequality between the person displaying negative behaviours and the victim or abuse of power. This study revealed that nurse managers should prudently use the legitimate and coercive powers which arise from their position at a level that will not cause bullying.","PeriodicalId":168708,"journal":{"name":"NursingRN: Hospital Nursing Administration (Sub-Topic)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NursingRN: Hospital Nursing Administration (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33844/IJOL.2018.60327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational study was conducted to determine the correlation between the perceptions of nurses about the power styles used by their managers and the bullying behaviours that are exposed to them by their managers.The sample of the study consisted of 822 nurses who worked in a public university hospital in Istanbul and agreed to participate in the study. The nurses who participated in this study evaluated the power styles used by their managers as legitimate power, reinforcing power, and coercive power, respectively. Almost half of the nurses in this study indicated that they were exposed to bullying behaviour by their managers in the last one year. It was found that current reinforcing powers of managers had an inverse effect on being exposed to bullying behaviours, whereas their legitimate and coercive powers (for head nurses) had a significant effect on being exposed to bullying behaviour. The legitimate and coercive power styles were effective in bullying behaviour and supported the presence of power inequality between the person displaying negative behaviours and the victim or abuse of power. This study revealed that nurse managers should prudently use the legitimate and coercive powers which arise from their position at a level that will not cause bullying.
护士长权力风格与欺凌行为的相关性研究
这项横断面、描述性和相关性研究旨在确定护士对其管理者使用的权力风格的看法与他们的管理者暴露给他们的欺凌行为之间的相关性。该研究的样本包括822名在伊斯坦布尔公立大学医院工作的护士,他们同意参加这项研究。参与本研究的护士将其管理者使用的权力类型分别评价为合法权力、强化权力和强制权力。在这项研究中,几乎有一半的护士表示,在过去的一年中,她们受到了管理人员的欺凌行为。研究发现,当前管理人员的强化权力对暴露于欺凌行为有相反的影响,而他们的合法和强制权力(护士长)对暴露于欺凌行为有显著的影响。合法和强制的权力风格在欺凌行为中是有效的,并且支持表现出消极行为的人与受害者或滥用权力的人之间存在权力不平等。这项研究表明,护士管理者应该谨慎使用合法和强制的权力,这些权力来自于他们在一个不会造成欺凌的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信