The fundamental importance of the Heaviside operational calculus

W. Wilson, C. G. Mayo, J. W. Head
{"title":"The fundamental importance of the Heaviside operational calculus","authors":"W. Wilson, C. G. Mayo, J. W. Head","doi":"10.1049/JBIRE.1962.0122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is an essential part of Heaviside's operational calculus that the symbol p is an operator equivalent to d/dt and that p and p−1 the inverse or integrating operator, are commutative. This is ensured if the operation of integration is not confused with the operation of selection, i.e. if the lower limit of integration is taken as minus infinity, and is only raised to a finite value when we are sure that this change has no effect. We have first set forth in as explicit a manner as possible what we believe to be the basis of Heaviside's own work, with particular attention to the properties of the unit function H(t) and the way in which differentiation and integration can be extended to include functions containing H(t) or its derivatives as factors. A continuous function approximating to H(t) is considered in an Appendix. The kinds of function (of time) that can occur in nature are carefully considered; the case of both passive and active networks is discussed. Heaviside's contemporaries were not prepared to accept his premises and methods even if they were forced to accept his results. The relation between Heaviside's calculus and Fourier analysis, symbolic calculus and Laplace transforms is therefore considered; the advocates of symbolic calculus and particularly of Laplace transforms have introduced difficulties and even errors which need not have occurred if they had followed Heaviside more faithfully.The full power and universality of Heaviside's approach (in which the mathematics was always subordinate to the physics) is made clear in Section 4, where the relation between input and output is considered for any system, not necessarily electrical; this relation is expressed by a single operational equation, but there are several possible ways of handling that equation and it is important not to choose too early which of these ways should be used.‡","PeriodicalId":213784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the British Institution of Radio Engineers","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1962-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the British Institution of Radio Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/JBIRE.1962.0122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is an essential part of Heaviside's operational calculus that the symbol p is an operator equivalent to d/dt and that p and p−1 the inverse or integrating operator, are commutative. This is ensured if the operation of integration is not confused with the operation of selection, i.e. if the lower limit of integration is taken as minus infinity, and is only raised to a finite value when we are sure that this change has no effect. We have first set forth in as explicit a manner as possible what we believe to be the basis of Heaviside's own work, with particular attention to the properties of the unit function H(t) and the way in which differentiation and integration can be extended to include functions containing H(t) or its derivatives as factors. A continuous function approximating to H(t) is considered in an Appendix. The kinds of function (of time) that can occur in nature are carefully considered; the case of both passive and active networks is discussed. Heaviside's contemporaries were not prepared to accept his premises and methods even if they were forced to accept his results. The relation between Heaviside's calculus and Fourier analysis, symbolic calculus and Laplace transforms is therefore considered; the advocates of symbolic calculus and particularly of Laplace transforms have introduced difficulties and even errors which need not have occurred if they had followed Heaviside more faithfully.The full power and universality of Heaviside's approach (in which the mathematics was always subordinate to the physics) is made clear in Section 4, where the relation between input and output is considered for any system, not necessarily electrical; this relation is expressed by a single operational equation, but there are several possible ways of handling that equation and it is important not to choose too early which of these ways should be used.‡
赫维赛德操作演算的根本重要性
这是Heaviside运算微积分的一个重要组成部分,符号p是一个相当于d/dt的算子,p和p−1逆或积分算子是可交换的。如果不把积分的操作与选择的操作混淆,也就是说,如果积分的下限是负无穷,只有当我们确信这种变化没有影响时,才把积分的下限提高到有限值,这一点才能得到保证。我们首先以尽可能明确的方式阐述了我们认为是Heaviside自己工作的基础,特别注意单位函数H(t)的性质,以及微分和积分可以扩展到包含H(t)或其导数作为因子的函数的方式。在附录中考虑了一个近似于H(t)的连续函数。自然界中可能发生的(时间)函数的种类是经过仔细考虑的;讨论了无源网络和有源网络的情况。赫维赛德的同时代人不准备接受他的前提和方法,即使他们被迫接受他的结果。因此,考虑了Heaviside微积分与傅里叶分析、符号微积分与拉普拉斯变换之间的关系;符号演算的拥护者,特别是拉普拉斯变换的拥护者带来了困难,甚至错误,如果他们更忠实地追随赫维赛德,就不会发生这些困难甚至错误。Heaviside的方法(数学总是从属于物理)的全部力量和普遍性在第4节中得到了明确说明,其中考虑了任何系统的输入和输出之间的关系,不一定是电气;这种关系可以用一个操作方程来表示,但有几种可能的方法来处理这个方程,重要的是不要过早地选择应该使用哪一种方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信