Equilibrium Optimizer and Henry Gas Solubility Optimization Algorithms for Feature Selection: Comparison Study

Khaoula Zineb Legoui, Sofiane Maza, A. Attia
{"title":"Equilibrium Optimizer and Henry Gas Solubility Optimization Algorithms for Feature Selection: Comparison Study","authors":"Khaoula Zineb Legoui, Sofiane Maza, A. Attia","doi":"10.1109/ISIA55826.2022.9993543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most critical processes is feature selection, which eliminates features that may decrease classification performance and increase computational time. In this paper, we introduce and provide a comparison study between two algorithms, which are Equilibrium Optimizer (EO) and Henry Gas Solubility Optimization (HGSO) for Feature Selection (FS). The function objective of both algorithms are based on two main objectives, such as Error Rate (ER) and feature Reduction Rates (RR). In this comparative study, three classifiers (Naive Bayes NB, k-Nearest Neighbor KNN, and Random Forest RF) have been employed. The evaluation of the work was conducted on ten datasets, including Iris, Lung Cancer, Spambase, and Musk. The two algorithms show higher performances according to the accuracy and number of features, especially HGSOFS, which in turn shows its effectiveness and provides good results in the two tasks of FS when we compare it to the PSOFS (Particle Swarm Optimization for Feature Selection) and FAFS (Fire Fly for Feature Selection).","PeriodicalId":169898,"journal":{"name":"2022 5th International Symposium on Informatics and its Applications (ISIA)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 5th International Symposium on Informatics and its Applications (ISIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIA55826.2022.9993543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the most critical processes is feature selection, which eliminates features that may decrease classification performance and increase computational time. In this paper, we introduce and provide a comparison study between two algorithms, which are Equilibrium Optimizer (EO) and Henry Gas Solubility Optimization (HGSO) for Feature Selection (FS). The function objective of both algorithms are based on two main objectives, such as Error Rate (ER) and feature Reduction Rates (RR). In this comparative study, three classifiers (Naive Bayes NB, k-Nearest Neighbor KNN, and Random Forest RF) have been employed. The evaluation of the work was conducted on ten datasets, including Iris, Lung Cancer, Spambase, and Musk. The two algorithms show higher performances according to the accuracy and number of features, especially HGSOFS, which in turn shows its effectiveness and provides good results in the two tasks of FS when we compare it to the PSOFS (Particle Swarm Optimization for Feature Selection) and FAFS (Fire Fly for Feature Selection).
平衡优化器和亨利气体溶解度优化算法的特征选择:比较研究
最关键的过程之一是特征选择,它消除了可能降低分类性能和增加计算时间的特征。本文介绍了两种用于特征选择(FS)的平衡优化算法(EO)和亨利气体溶解度优化算法(HGSO),并对其进行了比较研究。两种算法的功能目标都基于两个主要目标,即错误率(ER)和特征约简率(RR)。在这个比较研究中,使用了三种分类器(朴素贝叶斯NB, k近邻KNN和随机森林RF)。对这项工作的评估是在10个数据集上进行的,包括Iris、Lung Cancer、Spambase和Musk。与PSOFS (Particle Swarm Optimization for Feature Selection)和FAFS (Fire Fly for Feature Selection)相比,这两种算法在准确率和特征数量上都表现出更高的性能,尤其是HGSOFS,这反过来又证明了它的有效性,在FS的两个任务上都取得了很好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信