Accuracy Assessment of Airborne Mapping Based on Variation of Number and Distribution of Ground Control Points

Muhammad Syafiq Muhammad Zaly Shah, M. Ariff, A. Razali
{"title":"Accuracy Assessment of Airborne Mapping Based on Variation of Number and Distribution of Ground Control Points","authors":"Muhammad Syafiq Muhammad Zaly Shah, M. Ariff, A. Razali","doi":"10.1109/ICSPC55597.2022.10001799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orthomosaic is a map derived from numbers of overlapped aerial images that are stitched together using photogrammetry software. Orthomosaic can be used as an analysing tool to extract topographic features and monitoring applications. The accuracy of any photogrammetry product is important and can be dictated by various reasons. One of the prominent factors is the utilization of Ground Control Point (GCP). GCPs is known as sets of points in the study area that were established to provide aerial images with known coordinates through georeferencing process. The optimum GCP distribution is at the edge of the study area. However, it is sometimes impossible to access several areas of the mapping area due to unexpected prohibitions. The only option is to establish the point at the area where they can access it. Different numbers and distribution of GCP will contribute to the changes in accuracy. For this study, twelve points were established using GNSS observation. These points are utilized as either GCP or Check Point (CP). The number of GCP for each processing differs from three GCPs to six GCPs. Each number of GCP were distributed either at the edge or centre of the area. Edge distribution is supported with several GCPs at the centre. This study utilized a multi-rotor drone with an integrated camera for data acquisition. The method of analysis for this study is by comparing the coordinates of CP and computing the planimetric and vertical RMSE from each orthomosaic. This study found that the best GCP configuration with optimum accuracy is six GCPs with edge distribution with the RMSE of 2.9 cm and 4.4 cm for planimetric and vertical accuracy, respectively. This study helps to plan the task to establish the GCPs thoroughly to ensure great accuracy can be achieved regardless of the circumstances.","PeriodicalId":334831,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 10th Conference on Systems, Process & Control (ICSPC)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 10th Conference on Systems, Process & Control (ICSPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPC55597.2022.10001799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orthomosaic is a map derived from numbers of overlapped aerial images that are stitched together using photogrammetry software. Orthomosaic can be used as an analysing tool to extract topographic features and monitoring applications. The accuracy of any photogrammetry product is important and can be dictated by various reasons. One of the prominent factors is the utilization of Ground Control Point (GCP). GCPs is known as sets of points in the study area that were established to provide aerial images with known coordinates through georeferencing process. The optimum GCP distribution is at the edge of the study area. However, it is sometimes impossible to access several areas of the mapping area due to unexpected prohibitions. The only option is to establish the point at the area where they can access it. Different numbers and distribution of GCP will contribute to the changes in accuracy. For this study, twelve points were established using GNSS observation. These points are utilized as either GCP or Check Point (CP). The number of GCP for each processing differs from three GCPs to six GCPs. Each number of GCP were distributed either at the edge or centre of the area. Edge distribution is supported with several GCPs at the centre. This study utilized a multi-rotor drone with an integrated camera for data acquisition. The method of analysis for this study is by comparing the coordinates of CP and computing the planimetric and vertical RMSE from each orthomosaic. This study found that the best GCP configuration with optimum accuracy is six GCPs with edge distribution with the RMSE of 2.9 cm and 4.4 cm for planimetric and vertical accuracy, respectively. This study helps to plan the task to establish the GCPs thoroughly to ensure great accuracy can be achieved regardless of the circumstances.
基于地面控制点数量和分布变化的航空测图精度评估
正射影图是由使用摄影测量软件拼接在一起的许多重叠的航空图像衍生而成的地图。正射影可作为一种分析工具,用于提取地形特征和监测应用。任何摄影测量产品的准确性都很重要,并且可以由各种原因决定。其中一个突出的因素是地面控制点(GCP)的利用。gcp被称为研究区域内的点集,通过地理参考过程提供具有已知坐标的航空图像。GCP的最佳分布在研究区的边缘。然而,由于意想不到的禁令,有时无法进入映射区域的几个区域。唯一的选择是在他们可以访问的区域建立一个点。GCP的数量和分布的不同会导致精度的变化。本研究利用GNSS观测建立了12个点。这些点被用作GCP或检查点(CP)。每个处理的GCP数量从3个到6个不等。每个数目的GCP分布在区域的边缘或中心。边缘分布支持几个gcp在中心。本研究利用多旋翼无人机与集成摄像头进行数据采集。本研究的分析方法是通过比较CP的坐标并计算每个正交的平面和垂直RMSE。研究发现,最优精度的GCP配置为6个边缘分布的GCP,平面和垂直精度的RMSE分别为2.9 cm和4.4 cm。本研究有助于全面规划建立gcp的任务,以确保在任何情况下都能达到很高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信