A Qualitative Look at Faculty Perspectives on Ergonomics in Dental Education

Cynthia Senior, A. Burrell
{"title":"A Qualitative Look at Faculty Perspectives on Ergonomics in Dental Education","authors":"Cynthia Senior, A. Burrell","doi":"10.47285/hr.v2i2.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the high-risk nature of musculoskeletal disorder development in dentistry, ergonomic education and evaluation are needed in predoctoral programs.  The purpose of this pilot study is to investigate perceptions of ergonomics within the School of Dentistry (SOD), current ergonomic clinical practices among third- and fourth-year dental students, and dental students' level of knowledge of ergonomics.  The study was conducted utilizing an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to collect both quantitative and qualitative data.  While the data collection occurred in three phases, this article will primarily focus on Phase III.  The three phases of data collection were: Phase I consisted of a questionnaire distributed to all dental students; Phase II consisted of clinical observations of third- and fourth-year dental students' ergonomic postures during patient care, and Phase III consisted of SOD faculty focus groups to determine perceptions of ergonomic education with the predoctoral curriculum.  Data revealed three overarching themes: (1) Didactic to clinical disconnect, (2) Elective impacts, and (3) A ready commitment.  Phase I yielded a response rate of 84% (n=135).  Phase I responses noted that 81.5% (n=110) of the dental students reported experiencing musculoskeletal pain.  Ninety-three dental students reported receiving one or two lectures on ergonomics; however, 60% (n=27) failed to implement proper ergonomic postures while caring for patients in the clinical environment during Phase II.  Phase III, revealed faculty support of ergonomic evaluation and correction among dental students.  The results indicated a need to establish and implement an ergonomic evaluation and corrective program within the SOD","PeriodicalId":123317,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47285/hr.v2i2.113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Due to the high-risk nature of musculoskeletal disorder development in dentistry, ergonomic education and evaluation are needed in predoctoral programs.  The purpose of this pilot study is to investigate perceptions of ergonomics within the School of Dentistry (SOD), current ergonomic clinical practices among third- and fourth-year dental students, and dental students' level of knowledge of ergonomics.  The study was conducted utilizing an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to collect both quantitative and qualitative data.  While the data collection occurred in three phases, this article will primarily focus on Phase III.  The three phases of data collection were: Phase I consisted of a questionnaire distributed to all dental students; Phase II consisted of clinical observations of third- and fourth-year dental students' ergonomic postures during patient care, and Phase III consisted of SOD faculty focus groups to determine perceptions of ergonomic education with the predoctoral curriculum.  Data revealed three overarching themes: (1) Didactic to clinical disconnect, (2) Elective impacts, and (3) A ready commitment.  Phase I yielded a response rate of 84% (n=135).  Phase I responses noted that 81.5% (n=110) of the dental students reported experiencing musculoskeletal pain.  Ninety-three dental students reported receiving one or two lectures on ergonomics; however, 60% (n=27) failed to implement proper ergonomic postures while caring for patients in the clinical environment during Phase II.  Phase III, revealed faculty support of ergonomic evaluation and correction among dental students.  The results indicated a need to establish and implement an ergonomic evaluation and corrective program within the SOD
牙科教育中教师对人体工程学观点的定性分析
由于牙科肌肉骨骼疾病发展的高风险性质,需要在博士前课程中进行人体工程学教育和评估。这项初步研究的目的是调查牙科学院(SOD)对人体工程学的看法,目前三年级和四年级牙科学生的人体工程学临床实践,以及牙科学生对人体工程学的知识水平。本研究采用解释序贯混合方法设计,收集定量和定性资料。虽然数据收集分三个阶段进行,但本文将主要关注第三阶段。数据收集分为三个阶段:第一阶段是向所有牙科学生发放问卷;第二阶段包括临床观察三年级和四年级牙科学生在病人护理期间的人体工程学姿势,第三阶段包括SOD教师焦点小组,以确定博士预科课程中人体工程学教育的看法。数据揭示了三个总体主题:(1)教学与临床脱节,(2)选择性影响,(3)现成的承诺。第一阶段的有效率为84% (n=135)。第一阶段的反应指出,81.5% (n=110)的牙科学生报告有肌肉骨骼疼痛。93名牙科学生报告说,他们上过一到两次人体工程学的课;然而,在II期临床环境中,60% (n=27)的患者在照顾患者时未能采取正确的人体工程学姿势。第三阶段,揭示了教师对牙科学生的人体工程学评估和纠正的支持。结果表明,需要在SOD内建立和实施人体工程学评估和纠正程序
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信