Impacto del SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) en la docencia teórico-práctica de la neuroanatomía humana
A. García-Barrios, A. I. Cisneros-Gimeno, J. Whyte-Orozco
{"title":"Impacto del SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) en la docencia teórico-práctica de la neuroanatomía humana","authors":"A. García-Barrios, A. I. Cisneros-Gimeno, J. Whyte-Orozco","doi":"10.33588/fem.245.1146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. During the 2019-2020 academic year, and due to the situation caused by COVID-19, Human Neuroanatomy (4th semester- Degree of Medicine- University of Zaragoza) which under conditions of normality combines in-person theory and practice, had to consider itself in a telematic way by providing students with teaching materials through intranet ADD (Digital Teaching Ring)- Moodle©, Instagram©, as well as tutoring via Google Meet©. \nMaterial and methods. In order to be able to check the degree of satisfaction of the theoretical teaching- face-to-face versus telematic teaching, 2 questionnaires were carried out by the students (pre-COVID-19 and during COVID-19), of 4 and 6 closed questions respectively, with 5 answer options, according to Likert scale. In addition, 2 open questions were raised in each questionnaire. On the part of the teachers, was valued in a coordination meeting of the subject, after the end of the teaching period. \nResults. Satisfaction surveys were answered by 71% of students (68/95). The lack of attendance does not suffer a significant variation in both situations, but the reasons that have led to the absence, being the first being mainly professional, and the second reasons for connectivity. Students value in-person theoretical teaching versus telematics in a very similar way, while on a practical level, they continue to prefer face-to-face, coinciding with the teachers. \nConclusion. This evaluation confirms that the theoretical teaching of the subject via telematics is viable, as long as the students have good connectivity, but not the practical part, where attendance is essential today.","PeriodicalId":131160,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/fem.245.1146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Introduction. During the 2019-2020 academic year, and due to the situation caused by COVID-19, Human Neuroanatomy (4th semester- Degree of Medicine- University of Zaragoza) which under conditions of normality combines in-person theory and practice, had to consider itself in a telematic way by providing students with teaching materials through intranet ADD (Digital Teaching Ring)- Moodle©, Instagram©, as well as tutoring via Google Meet©.
Material and methods. In order to be able to check the degree of satisfaction of the theoretical teaching- face-to-face versus telematic teaching, 2 questionnaires were carried out by the students (pre-COVID-19 and during COVID-19), of 4 and 6 closed questions respectively, with 5 answer options, according to Likert scale. In addition, 2 open questions were raised in each questionnaire. On the part of the teachers, was valued in a coordination meeting of the subject, after the end of the teaching period.
Results. Satisfaction surveys were answered by 71% of students (68/95). The lack of attendance does not suffer a significant variation in both situations, but the reasons that have led to the absence, being the first being mainly professional, and the second reasons for connectivity. Students value in-person theoretical teaching versus telematics in a very similar way, while on a practical level, they continue to prefer face-to-face, coinciding with the teachers.
Conclusion. This evaluation confirms that the theoretical teaching of the subject via telematics is viable, as long as the students have good connectivity, but not the practical part, where attendance is essential today.
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)对人体神经解剖学理论-实践教学的影响
介绍。在2019-2020学年,由于COVID-19造成的情况,人体神经解剖学(第四学期-医学学位-萨拉戈萨大学)在正常情况下将亲自理论与实践相结合,必须考虑以远程信息处理的方式,通过内联网ADD(数字教学环)- Moodle©,Instagram©为学生提供教材,并通过谷歌Meet©进行辅导。材料和方法。为了能够检查理论教学的满意度-面对面还是远程教学,根据李克特量表,学生进行了2份问卷(COVID-19前和COVID-19期间),分别有4个和6个封闭式问题,5个答案选项。此外,每份问卷中还提出了2个开放性问题。在教师方面,在该学科的协调会议上得到了重视,在教学结束后。结果。71%的学生(68/95)回答了满意度调查。缺勤在两种情况下都没有明显的差异,但导致缺勤的原因,首先主要是专业原因,其次是连通性原因。学生重视面对面的理论教学与远程信息处理的方式非常相似,而在实践层面上,他们仍然更喜欢面对面的教学,与老师一致。结论。这一评估证实,只要学生有良好的网络连接,通过远程信息处理技术进行学科的理论教学是可行的,但不是实践部分,在今天,出勤是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。