{"title":"The Right to a Nonprojected Future","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1wmz48h.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his book A Bias for Hope, economist Albert O. Hirschman (1971) chal lenges social scientists to move beyond categorical prejudgments, beyond the sole search for general laws and orderly sequences of what is required for wider social and political transformation. Having in mind the Latin American countries in which he worked (including Brazil), Hirschman challenges us, instead, to engage the unexpected. The study of how beliefs, attitudes, and values are refashioned and molded by “more or less accidentally undertaken practices,” Hirschman argues, “widens the limits of what is or is perceived to be possible, be it at the cost of lowering our ability, real or imaginary, to discern the probable” (p. 28). At stake is helping “to defend the right to a nonprojected future as one of the truly inalienable rights of every person and nation; and to set the stage for conceptions of change to which the inventiveness of history and a ‘passion for the possible’ are admitted as vital actors” (p. 37). This book addresses the crucial question of what happens when such luminous prospects of social science are politically and technologically operationalized. Brazil has, against all odds, invented a public way of treating AIDS. In 1996, it became the first developing country to adopt an official policy that universalized access to antiretroviral drugs (ARVs), about five years before global policy discussions moved from a frame work that focused solely on prevention to one that incorporated universal treatment. Some 200,000 Brazilians are currently taking ARVs that are paid for by the government, and this policy is widely touted as a model for stemming the AIDS crisis in the developing world. This life saving policy came into existence through an unexpected alliance of activists, government reformers, development agencies and the pharmaceutical in dustry. Will to Live moves between a social analysis of the institutional practices shaping the Brazilian response to AIDS and the stories and lives of people affected by it.","PeriodicalId":137233,"journal":{"name":"Will to Live","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Will to Live","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1wmz48h.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In his book A Bias for Hope, economist Albert O. Hirschman (1971) chal lenges social scientists to move beyond categorical prejudgments, beyond the sole search for general laws and orderly sequences of what is required for wider social and political transformation. Having in mind the Latin American countries in which he worked (including Brazil), Hirschman challenges us, instead, to engage the unexpected. The study of how beliefs, attitudes, and values are refashioned and molded by “more or less accidentally undertaken practices,” Hirschman argues, “widens the limits of what is or is perceived to be possible, be it at the cost of lowering our ability, real or imaginary, to discern the probable” (p. 28). At stake is helping “to defend the right to a nonprojected future as one of the truly inalienable rights of every person and nation; and to set the stage for conceptions of change to which the inventiveness of history and a ‘passion for the possible’ are admitted as vital actors” (p. 37). This book addresses the crucial question of what happens when such luminous prospects of social science are politically and technologically operationalized. Brazil has, against all odds, invented a public way of treating AIDS. In 1996, it became the first developing country to adopt an official policy that universalized access to antiretroviral drugs (ARVs), about five years before global policy discussions moved from a frame work that focused solely on prevention to one that incorporated universal treatment. Some 200,000 Brazilians are currently taking ARVs that are paid for by the government, and this policy is widely touted as a model for stemming the AIDS crisis in the developing world. This life saving policy came into existence through an unexpected alliance of activists, government reformers, development agencies and the pharmaceutical in dustry. Will to Live moves between a social analysis of the institutional practices shaping the Brazilian response to AIDS and the stories and lives of people affected by it.
经济学家阿尔伯特·o·赫希曼(Albert O. Hirschman, 1971)在他的著作《希望的偏见》(A Bias for Hope)中向社会科学家提出了挑战,要求他们超越绝对的先断,超越对一般规律和更广泛的社会和政治变革所需的有序顺序的唯一探索。考虑到他工作过的拉美国家(包括巴西),赫希曼向我们提出了挑战,让我们接触意想不到的东西。赫希曼认为,对信仰、态度和价值观是如何被“或多或少偶然进行的实践”重塑和塑造的研究,“扩大了我们认为可能发生或被认为可能发生的事情的界限,可能是以降低我们辨别可能性的能力为代价的,无论是真实的还是想象的”(第28页)。关键在于帮助“捍卫不可预见未来的权利,这是每个人和每个国家真正不可剥夺的权利之一;并为变革的概念搭建舞台,在这个舞台上,历史的创造性和“对可能性的激情”被承认为至关重要的行动者。本书探讨了这样一个关键问题:当这种光明的社会科学前景在政治和技术上实现时,会发生什么?巴西克服重重困难,发明了一种治疗艾滋病的公共方法。1996年,它成为第一个采用普及抗逆转录病毒药物(ARVs)官方政策的发展中国家,大约5年后,全球政策讨论才从只注重预防的框架转向纳入普遍治疗的框架。目前大约有20万巴西人在服用由政府支付的抗逆转录病毒药物,这一政策被广泛吹捧为遏制发展中国家艾滋病危机的典范。这项拯救生命的政策是通过积极分子、政府改革者、发展机构和制药行业意想不到的联盟而产生的。《生活的意志》在对巴西应对艾滋病的制度实践的社会分析和受艾滋病影响的人们的故事和生活之间展开。