Long-term Life Cycle Impact of Agile Methodologies

M. Kajko-Mattsson, G. Lewis, Dave Siracusa, Taylor Nelson, N. Chapin, Michael Heydt, Jason Nocks, Harry Snee
{"title":"Long-term Life Cycle Impact of Agile Methodologies","authors":"M. Kajko-Mattsson, G. Lewis, Dave Siracusa, Taylor Nelson, N. Chapin, Michael Heydt, Jason Nocks, Harry Snee","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2006.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dissatisfaction with heavyweight development approaches has lead to a proposal of agile methodologies. While heavyweight approaches are geared towards careful project planning, formalized quality assurance, and controlled and rigorous software development processes, the agile approaches focus on quick adaptation to change, and flexibility. Today, there are a number of different agile methods available, such as Scrum, Crystal, Adaptive Software Development, Feature Driven Development, and extreme programming. Although different, they share the same principles. Some of them are: (1) individuals and interactions over processes and tools, (2) working code over comprehensive documentation, (3) customer collaboration over contract negotiation, and (4) responding to change over following a plan. The proponents claim that agile methodologies lead to more effective and efficient development. The opponents, on the other hand, have stamped the agile approach as a \"license to hack\" or \"cowboy\", or \"code-and-fix\" method.","PeriodicalId":436673,"journal":{"name":"2006 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2006.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Dissatisfaction with heavyweight development approaches has lead to a proposal of agile methodologies. While heavyweight approaches are geared towards careful project planning, formalized quality assurance, and controlled and rigorous software development processes, the agile approaches focus on quick adaptation to change, and flexibility. Today, there are a number of different agile methods available, such as Scrum, Crystal, Adaptive Software Development, Feature Driven Development, and extreme programming. Although different, they share the same principles. Some of them are: (1) individuals and interactions over processes and tools, (2) working code over comprehensive documentation, (3) customer collaboration over contract negotiation, and (4) responding to change over following a plan. The proponents claim that agile methodologies lead to more effective and efficient development. The opponents, on the other hand, have stamped the agile approach as a "license to hack" or "cowboy", or "code-and-fix" method.
敏捷方法对长期生命周期的影响
对重量级开发方法的不满导致了敏捷方法的提出。重量级方法侧重于仔细的项目计划、形式化的质量保证,以及受控和严格的软件开发过程,而敏捷方法侧重于对变化的快速适应和灵活性。今天,有许多不同的敏捷方法可用,如Scrum、Crystal、自适应软件开发、特性驱动开发和极限编程。虽然不同,但它们有相同的原则。其中一些是:(1)个人和交互重于过程和工具,(2)工作代码重于全面的文档,(3)客户协作重于合同谈判,以及(4)响应变更重于遵循计划。支持者声称敏捷方法能带来更有效和高效的开发。另一方面,反对者则将敏捷方法视为“黑客许可证”或“牛仔”,或“编码-修复”方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信