Critical Discourse Analysis of Iranian Political Cinema with Fairclough Approach

B. Afshin, A. Gholamreza
{"title":"Critical Discourse Analysis of Iranian Political Cinema with Fairclough Approach","authors":"B. Afshin, A. Gholamreza","doi":"10.4172/2332-0761.1000233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to analyze the discourse of political cinema of Iran after the war with the approach of Fairclough's approach. For the purpose of this research is descriptive-analysis was conducted to collect information on library. The research community in the aftermath of the Islamic Revolution \"from 1989 to 1996, the film Refugee, 1997 to 2005, organ on color film and from 2006 to 2013, movies influence\" was studied. According to the findings in the first period, \"1989 to 1996\", pure thoughts patriotic and revolutionary themes have been witnessing a fundamental transformation. Which include two periods, first, the concept of \"development\" that accompanied the pattern of \"rationality\" are the Rafsanjani government concept. The discourse of war, the rise of the urban upper classes and groups based on the concept of \"construction\", ie development projects, all of which are examples. But in the second part of the first period, the discourse of \"democracy\" and \"freedom\" are met. In the second decade 1997 to 2005, traditional political discourse, the discourse changed reformer. Government film policy, in particular, before and after of June, under the sovereignty of political discourse \"conservative\" and \"reformist\" has been developed. The third period, from 2006 to 2013 with the victory of Ahmadinejad, to open in 1981 on a new meaning system helped the fundamentalist interpretation. Therefore it can be concluded that the selected films examined in this study have implications affecting the society of his time were political. Iranian cinema films are not political in the true sense, of course, movies that have claims in this direction but none of them can define the configuration of political theater. In other words, if we look at the political cinema as a genre have to say that this genre, like many other genres by ideas and Alqa’hay Hollywood and West and Western theories (as other items to be imposed Cinema) this genre has been imposed on our minds.","PeriodicalId":118558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the discourse of political cinema of Iran after the war with the approach of Fairclough's approach. For the purpose of this research is descriptive-analysis was conducted to collect information on library. The research community in the aftermath of the Islamic Revolution "from 1989 to 1996, the film Refugee, 1997 to 2005, organ on color film and from 2006 to 2013, movies influence" was studied. According to the findings in the first period, "1989 to 1996", pure thoughts patriotic and revolutionary themes have been witnessing a fundamental transformation. Which include two periods, first, the concept of "development" that accompanied the pattern of "rationality" are the Rafsanjani government concept. The discourse of war, the rise of the urban upper classes and groups based on the concept of "construction", ie development projects, all of which are examples. But in the second part of the first period, the discourse of "democracy" and "freedom" are met. In the second decade 1997 to 2005, traditional political discourse, the discourse changed reformer. Government film policy, in particular, before and after of June, under the sovereignty of political discourse "conservative" and "reformist" has been developed. The third period, from 2006 to 2013 with the victory of Ahmadinejad, to open in 1981 on a new meaning system helped the fundamentalist interpretation. Therefore it can be concluded that the selected films examined in this study have implications affecting the society of his time were political. Iranian cinema films are not political in the true sense, of course, movies that have claims in this direction but none of them can define the configuration of political theater. In other words, if we look at the political cinema as a genre have to say that this genre, like many other genres by ideas and Alqa’hay Hollywood and West and Western theories (as other items to be imposed Cinema) this genre has been imposed on our minds.
用费尔克劳的方法分析伊朗政治电影的批评话语
本研究旨在运用费尔克劳的研究方法,分析战后伊朗政治电影的话语。本研究的目的是进行描述性分析,以收集有关图书馆的信息。研究界对伊斯兰革命后的“1989年至1996年,电影《难民》,1997年至2005年,机关对彩色电影和2006年至2013年,电影的影响”进行了研究。从第一个时期“1989 - 1996”来看,纯思想、爱国主义和革命主题发生了根本性的转变。其中包括两个时期,一是伴随着“理性”模式的“发展”概念是拉夫桑贾尼政府的概念。战争的话语,基于“建设”概念的城市上层阶级和群体的崛起,即开发项目,这些都是例子。但在第一阶段的第二部分,“民主”与“自由”的话语相遇。在1997年至2005年的第二个十年里,传统政治话语发生了变革,话语发生了变革。特别是政府的电影政策,在6月前后,主权下的政治话语“保守”和“改良”得到了发展。第三个时期,从2006年到2013年,随着内贾德的胜利,1981年开启了一个新的意义体系,帮助了原教旨主义者的解释。因此,可以得出的结论是,本研究中所选的电影对他那个时代的社会有影响,是政治性的。伊朗电影并不是真正意义上的政治电影,当然,电影在这个方向上有主张,但它们都不能定义政治剧院的结构。换句话说,如果我们把政治电影作为一种类型来看待,不得不说这种类型,就像许多其他类型一样,由好莱坞和西方的思想和西方的理论(作为其他项目被强加的电影),这种类型已经被强加在我们的思想上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信