{"title":"Obraz w obrazie i rama. Schulz wobec tradycji","authors":"Ariko Katō","doi":"10.26881/sf.2021.17-18.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to reevaluate Schulz’s early drawings from 1919 to 1921, rarely included in scholarship on Schulz’s artwork, by focusing on the motifs of “picture within a picture,” imitation of historical paintings, and the frame of the image. Previous scholarship on Schulz’s artwork mainly discussed the specific theme of men’s worship of women in the 1920s cliché-verre series The Book of Idolatry and regarded Schulz’s seemingly realistic renderings as “anachronistic” compared to twentieth-century modernist art. Here, I will first focus on Schulz’s adaptation of the style of historical paintings into his so-called “masochistic motifs” of men supplicating themselves to women. By creating a gap between the style and the content expectations of the viewer familiar with the conventions of European paintings, Schulz’s early drawings question the custom or conventional understanding of paintings created for acceptance and success in the European Art Academy system. Second, I invoke Derrida’s interpretation of the concept of “parergon” in The Truth in Painting (1978) to reconsider the motifs of frame and “picture within a picture,” omnipresent in Schulz’s early drawings. Through these means, I explore Schulz’s perception and attitude regarding medium specifics of paintings as Clement Greenberg argued regarding modernist paintings. Thus, I discuss his early drawings as self-referential and radically modernist works.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schulz/Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/sf.2021.17-18.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article aims to reevaluate Schulz’s early drawings from 1919 to 1921, rarely included in scholarship on Schulz’s artwork, by focusing on the motifs of “picture within a picture,” imitation of historical paintings, and the frame of the image. Previous scholarship on Schulz’s artwork mainly discussed the specific theme of men’s worship of women in the 1920s cliché-verre series The Book of Idolatry and regarded Schulz’s seemingly realistic renderings as “anachronistic” compared to twentieth-century modernist art. Here, I will first focus on Schulz’s adaptation of the style of historical paintings into his so-called “masochistic motifs” of men supplicating themselves to women. By creating a gap between the style and the content expectations of the viewer familiar with the conventions of European paintings, Schulz’s early drawings question the custom or conventional understanding of paintings created for acceptance and success in the European Art Academy system. Second, I invoke Derrida’s interpretation of the concept of “parergon” in The Truth in Painting (1978) to reconsider the motifs of frame and “picture within a picture,” omnipresent in Schulz’s early drawings. Through these means, I explore Schulz’s perception and attitude regarding medium specifics of paintings as Clement Greenberg argued regarding modernist paintings. Thus, I discuss his early drawings as self-referential and radically modernist works.
本文旨在通过关注“画中之画”、对历史绘画的模仿和图像框架的主题,重新评估舒尔茨1919年至1921年的早期绘画,这些绘画很少被纳入舒尔茨艺术作品的学术研究中。以往关于舒尔茨艺术作品的学术研究,主要讨论的是20世纪20年代老套的《the Book of Idolatry》系列中男性崇拜女性的具体主题,认为舒尔茨看似现实的渲染与20世纪的现代主义艺术相比是“不合时宜的”。在这里,我将首先关注舒尔茨将历史绘画风格改编为他所谓的“受虐主题”,即男性向女性恳求自己。通过在熟悉欧洲绘画惯例的观众的风格和内容期望之间制造差距,舒尔茨的早期绘画质疑了在欧洲艺术学院系统中为接受和成功而创作的绘画的习俗或传统理解。其次,我引用德里达在《绘画中的真理》(the Truth in Painting, 1978)中对“parergon”概念的解释,重新思考舒尔茨早期绘画中无处不在的框架和“画中之画”的主题。通过这些手段,我探索了舒尔茨对绘画媒介细节的看法和态度,就像克莱门特·格林伯格对现代主义绘画的看法一样。因此,我讨论他的早期绘画作为自我参照和激进的现代主义作品。