Performance comparisons of STDD and FDD schemes for TDMA systems using NC-PRMA protocol

Jee-Wey Wang, J. Wen
{"title":"Performance comparisons of STDD and FDD schemes for TDMA systems using NC-PRMA protocol","authors":"Jee-Wey Wang, J. Wen","doi":"10.1109/PIMRC.1996.567421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new protocol called non-collision packet reservation multiple access (NC-PRMA) is introduced. Two kinds of duplexing schemes, frequency division duplexing (FDD) and shared time division duplexing (STDD), are taken into account. For the FDD scheme, each speech terminal is modeled as a two-state Markov process, whereas for the STDD scheme, each two-way conversation is characterized by a three-state Markov process. After modeling the offered traffic, the system performance measures, including channel throughput, mean access delay, and packet dropping probability are evaluated. In particular, the system capacities of both schemes are emphasized. The system capacity, denoted by M/sub 0.01/ is defined as the maximum number of conversations which can be supported under the constraint of packet dropping probability being no more than 1%. It is shown that the values of M/sub 0.01/ for the FDD and STDD schemes are about 38 and 45, respectively. This indicates that the STDD scheme achieves a significant improvement in system capacity relative to the FDD scheme. In addition, the numerical and simulation results show that our analytical approach yields reasonable accurate results.","PeriodicalId":206655,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of PIMRC '96 - 7th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Communications","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of PIMRC '96 - 7th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.1996.567421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A new protocol called non-collision packet reservation multiple access (NC-PRMA) is introduced. Two kinds of duplexing schemes, frequency division duplexing (FDD) and shared time division duplexing (STDD), are taken into account. For the FDD scheme, each speech terminal is modeled as a two-state Markov process, whereas for the STDD scheme, each two-way conversation is characterized by a three-state Markov process. After modeling the offered traffic, the system performance measures, including channel throughput, mean access delay, and packet dropping probability are evaluated. In particular, the system capacities of both schemes are emphasized. The system capacity, denoted by M/sub 0.01/ is defined as the maximum number of conversations which can be supported under the constraint of packet dropping probability being no more than 1%. It is shown that the values of M/sub 0.01/ for the FDD and STDD schemes are about 38 and 45, respectively. This indicates that the STDD scheme achieves a significant improvement in system capacity relative to the FDD scheme. In addition, the numerical and simulation results show that our analytical approach yields reasonable accurate results.
采用NC-PRMA协议的TDMA系统中STDD和FDD方案的性能比较
提出了一种新的非冲突分组保留多址(NC-PRMA)协议。考虑了两种双工方案:频分双工(FDD)和共享时分双工(STDD)。对于FDD方案,每个语音终端都被建模为一个两态马尔可夫过程,而对于STDD方案,每个双向会话都被表征为一个三态马尔可夫过程。在对提供的流量建模之后,评估了系统性能指标,包括信道吞吐量、平均访问延迟和丢包概率。特别强调了这两种方案的系统能力。系统容量(M/sub 0.01/)定义为在丢包概率不大于1%的约束下所能支持的最大会话数。结果表明,FDD和STDD方案的M/sub 0.01/分别约为38和45。这说明相对于FDD方案,STDD方案在系统容量上有很大的提升。数值和仿真结果表明,本文的分析方法得到了合理、准确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信