Pre-Medicated Murder: Violence and the Degree to Which the Mentally Ill Can Refuse Treatment

G. Edwards
{"title":"Pre-Medicated Murder: Violence and the Degree to Which the Mentally Ill Can Refuse Treatment","authors":"G. Edwards","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2573331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: As part of the expansive overhaul of the mental health system, many states have passed laws that allow, under certain conditions, voluntary and involuntarily committed patients to refuse medication. While some predicted the consequences of these laws would be dire, the effect on violent behavior remains untested. This study measures the effect of various right to refuse medication laws on homicides.Method: Using a sample of the homicide rate of every US state between 1972 and 2001 (N=1,479), I compare the difference in homicide rates before and after a law change to that same difference in a set of control states to estimate the effect of laws aimed at extending the right to refuse medication to both voluntary and involuntarily committed mental health patients. Results: Laws designed to allow voluntarily committed patients to refuse medication are associated with a 0.8 increase in the homicide rate, and while point estimates suggest that allowing for review of requests to refuse medication are associated with a decrease in the homicide rate, the estimates are imprecise and statistically insignificant.Conclusion: Allowing voluntarily committed patients to refuse medication may entice some to enter in-patient facilities, but the brief and optional exposure to medication and their side effects may actually discourage treatment and increase violence.","PeriodicalId":191231,"journal":{"name":"Law & Psychology eJournal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Psychology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2573331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: As part of the expansive overhaul of the mental health system, many states have passed laws that allow, under certain conditions, voluntary and involuntarily committed patients to refuse medication. While some predicted the consequences of these laws would be dire, the effect on violent behavior remains untested. This study measures the effect of various right to refuse medication laws on homicides.Method: Using a sample of the homicide rate of every US state between 1972 and 2001 (N=1,479), I compare the difference in homicide rates before and after a law change to that same difference in a set of control states to estimate the effect of laws aimed at extending the right to refuse medication to both voluntary and involuntarily committed mental health patients. Results: Laws designed to allow voluntarily committed patients to refuse medication are associated with a 0.8 increase in the homicide rate, and while point estimates suggest that allowing for review of requests to refuse medication are associated with a decrease in the homicide rate, the estimates are imprecise and statistically insignificant.Conclusion: Allowing voluntarily committed patients to refuse medication may entice some to enter in-patient facilities, but the brief and optional exposure to medication and their side effects may actually discourage treatment and increase violence.
预先用药谋杀:暴力和精神病患者可以拒绝治疗的程度
目的:作为精神卫生系统全面改革的一部分,许多州已经通过了法律,允许在某些条件下,自愿和非自愿的病人拒绝药物治疗。虽然一些人预测这些法律的后果将是可怕的,但对暴力行为的影响仍未经检验。这项研究衡量了各种拒绝药物法律对杀人案的影响。方法:使用1972年至2001年间美国每个州的凶杀率样本(N= 1479),我比较了法律变更前后凶杀率的差异,以及一组控制州的相同差异,以估计旨在将拒绝药物治疗的权利扩展到自愿和非自愿精神疾病患者的法律的效果。结果:允许自愿服药的患者拒绝服药的法律与凶杀率增加0.8有关,而点估计表明,允许对拒绝服药的请求进行审查与凶杀率下降有关,这些估计是不精确的,在统计上是不显著的。结论:允许自愿服药的患者拒绝服药可能会诱使一些人进入住院设施,但短暂和选择性地接触药物及其副作用实际上可能会阻碍治疗并增加暴力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信