Mia A. Charifson M.A. , Dorice Vieira M.A., M.P.H. , Jacquelyn Shaw M.D. , Siobhan Kehoe M.D. , Gwendolyn P. Quinn Ph.D.
{"title":"Why are Black individuals disproportionately burdened with uterine fibroids and how are we examining this disparity? A systematic review","authors":"Mia A. Charifson M.A. , Dorice Vieira M.A., M.P.H. , Jacquelyn Shaw M.D. , Siobhan Kehoe M.D. , Gwendolyn P. Quinn Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfnr.2022.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>To systematically review and summarize the literaure on nongenetic risk factors that may contribute to the racial disparity in </span>uterine fibroids (UF) that disproportionality impacts Black individuals at 2-3 times the rate of White individuals and how the racial disparity has been studied to date.</p></div><div><h3>Evidence Review</h3><p>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol checklist guided the systematic review process. From January 1 to June 1, 2021, relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Multiple investigators screened, assessed, extracted, and critically appraised the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>A total of 44 articles examined the relationship among UFs, race/ethnicity, and nongenetic risk factors, including cardiometabolic features, comorbidities, diet, chemical exposures, vitamin D levels, reproductive characteristics and socioeconomic factors, and life experiences. Most studies reported on the same 3 </span>cohort study populations, and there was inconsistent statistical reporting of the race/ethnicity, risk factors, and UF relationship.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Many potential risk factors related to the racial disparity in UF have been studied thus far. There is still little conclusive evidence regarding which risk factors are the greatest contributors to racial disparities in UF. Promising areas of research deserve greater attention and a greater diversity of study populations and analytical methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73011,"journal":{"name":"F&S reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666571922000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
To systematically review and summarize the literaure on nongenetic risk factors that may contribute to the racial disparity in uterine fibroids (UF) that disproportionality impacts Black individuals at 2-3 times the rate of White individuals and how the racial disparity has been studied to date.
Evidence Review
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol checklist guided the systematic review process. From January 1 to June 1, 2021, relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Multiple investigators screened, assessed, extracted, and critically appraised the data.
Results
A total of 44 articles examined the relationship among UFs, race/ethnicity, and nongenetic risk factors, including cardiometabolic features, comorbidities, diet, chemical exposures, vitamin D levels, reproductive characteristics and socioeconomic factors, and life experiences. Most studies reported on the same 3 cohort study populations, and there was inconsistent statistical reporting of the race/ethnicity, risk factors, and UF relationship.
Conclusion
Many potential risk factors related to the racial disparity in UF have been studied thus far. There is still little conclusive evidence regarding which risk factors are the greatest contributors to racial disparities in UF. Promising areas of research deserve greater attention and a greater diversity of study populations and analytical methods.
目的系统回顾和总结有关非遗传危险因素可能导致黑人比例失调率为白人2-3倍的子宫肌瘤(UF)种族差异的文献,以及迄今为止有关种族差异的研究情况。证据评价系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目清单指导了系统评价过程。从2021年1月1日至6月1日,检索PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane Library的相关文章。多位研究者对数据进行筛选、评估、提取和批判性评估。结果共有44篇文章研究了UFs、种族/民族和非遗传风险因素之间的关系,包括心脏代谢特征、合并症、饮食、化学物质暴露、维生素D水平、生殖特征和社会经济因素以及生活经历。大多数研究报告了相同的3个队列研究人群,关于种族/民族、危险因素和UF关系的统计报告不一致。结论目前已经研究了许多与UF种族差异相关的潜在危险因素。关于哪些风险因素是佛罗里达大学种族差异的最大贡献者,仍然没有确凿的证据。有前途的研究领域应该得到更多的关注,研究人群和分析方法应该更加多样化。