PERBANDINGAN ANTARA CONTINUOUS TRAINING DAN INTERVAL TRAINING TERHADAP PENINGKATAN VO2 MAX PADA MAHASISWA FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS PADJADJARAN

Arjun Salahuddin, Harry E. Saroinsong, A. Kartamihardja
{"title":"PERBANDINGAN ANTARA CONTINUOUS TRAINING DAN INTERVAL TRAINING TERHADAP PENINGKATAN VO2 MAX PADA MAHASISWA FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS PADJADJARAN","authors":"Arjun Salahuddin, Harry E. Saroinsong, A. Kartamihardja","doi":"10.51671/JIFO.V1I1.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interval training and continuous training are two models of physical exercise that often used to increase VO2 max. Until now there is no data available, which model is better in the increasing the VO2 max. The aim of this study is to compare the capability between Interval training and continuous training models in increasing the VO2 max. The study was cohort study. Sample of the study are 30 students of the Faculty of Medicine of Universitas Padjadjaran that is 19-24 years old (average 21,7 ± 1,371 years old). Cooper-test method was used to measure the VO2 max where sample are running for 12 minutes in 400 meters running track. The result of Study shows that Interval training increased the VO2 max in the range of 2,64 to 5,06 mL/kg.minutes (average 3,077 ± 0,675 mL/kg.minutes) otherwise continuous training increased the VO2 max in the range of 1,16 to 3,19 mL/kg.minutes (average 2,465 ± 0,611 mL/kg.minutes). The conclusion is that Interval training can increase the VO2 max better than continuous training.","PeriodicalId":143351,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL ILMU FAAL OLAHRAGA INDONESIA","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL ILMU FAAL OLAHRAGA INDONESIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51671/JIFO.V1I1.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interval training and continuous training are two models of physical exercise that often used to increase VO2 max. Until now there is no data available, which model is better in the increasing the VO2 max. The aim of this study is to compare the capability between Interval training and continuous training models in increasing the VO2 max. The study was cohort study. Sample of the study are 30 students of the Faculty of Medicine of Universitas Padjadjaran that is 19-24 years old (average 21,7 ± 1,371 years old). Cooper-test method was used to measure the VO2 max where sample are running for 12 minutes in 400 meters running track. The result of Study shows that Interval training increased the VO2 max in the range of 2,64 to 5,06 mL/kg.minutes (average 3,077 ± 0,675 mL/kg.minutes) otherwise continuous training increased the VO2 max in the range of 1,16 to 3,19 mL/kg.minutes (average 2,465 ± 0,611 mL/kg.minutes). The conclusion is that Interval training can increase the VO2 max better than continuous training.
持续的培训与偶尔的培训与日益增加的PADJADJARAN大学医学院学生的最大VO2的比较
间歇训练和连续训练是两种经常用于增加最大摄氧量的体育锻炼模式。到目前为止还没有数据,哪个模型在增加VO2 max方面更好。本研究的目的是比较间歇训练和连续训练模式在提高最大摄氧量方面的能力。该研究是队列研究。研究对象为印度帕迪亚贾兰大学医学院学生30名,年龄19-24岁(平均21.7±1371岁)。在400米跑道上跑12分钟,用Cooper-test法测定最大摄氧量。研究结果表明,间歇训练可使最大摄氧量在2.64 ~ 5.06 mL/kg范围内增加。(平均3,077±0,675 mL/kg.min),否则持续训练可使最大摄氧量在1,16 ~ 3,19 mL/kg范围内增加。分钟(平均2465±0.611 mL/kg.minutes)。结论:间歇训练比连续训练更能提高最大摄氧量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信