A Detailed Examination of the Mechanics of Slip Crush When Landing Heavy Casing Strings

Robert L. Thibodeaux
{"title":"A Detailed Examination of the Mechanics of Slip Crush When Landing Heavy Casing Strings","authors":"Robert L. Thibodeaux","doi":"10.4043/29761-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Over the last 50 years, the oil & gas industry has continually pushed the limits of exploration, riding the wave of recent technological advances to pioneer ultra-deepwater areas of the globe. Not until the early 80s, though, did operators start delving below the salt canopy, into reserves like the Wilcox in the Gulf of Mexico. This sub-salt (or pre-salt) trend expanded well program depths in excess of 30,000 ft MD, in water depths exceeding 10,000 ft, necessitating longer, heavier casing/landing strings.\n Meanwhile, new government regulations have begun mandating well designs capable of sustaining Worst Case Discharge (WCD). Deeper casing strings, in turn, must now be constructed to withstand higher collapse loads, shallow casing strings to handle more robust burst loads. Certain well designs must even feature an intermediate tieback able to endure WCD, where previously a nested liner was sufficient.\n This confluence of increasingly deep wells and stringent regulations presents challenges. Longer, heavier casing/landing strings push the limits of existing tubular tensile capacity, but as important, they also raise concerns about handling equipment possibly crushing landing strings due to excessive radial load (slip crush).\n In response, since the mid-80s, a research and testing program has been analyzing and quantifying specific factors involved when crushing loads affect tubular goods failure. Some of the identified causatives behind these increased tubular stresses are handling equipment design, vessel heave-induced dynamic loading, dynamic loading during tripping, and handling equipment-related slip crush loading. A detailed analysis of the mechanics of slip crush revealed modifying certain parameters has a material effect on the radial load imparted onto the pipe by the slips. The research shows that modifying and optimizing the combination of these parameters can not only lead to the design of handling equipment with higher slip crush capacities, but it also leads to the development of a comprehensive model that can more accurately predict the failure of tubular goods due to slip crush.","PeriodicalId":415055,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 29, 2019","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 29, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29761-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last 50 years, the oil & gas industry has continually pushed the limits of exploration, riding the wave of recent technological advances to pioneer ultra-deepwater areas of the globe. Not until the early 80s, though, did operators start delving below the salt canopy, into reserves like the Wilcox in the Gulf of Mexico. This sub-salt (or pre-salt) trend expanded well program depths in excess of 30,000 ft MD, in water depths exceeding 10,000 ft, necessitating longer, heavier casing/landing strings. Meanwhile, new government regulations have begun mandating well designs capable of sustaining Worst Case Discharge (WCD). Deeper casing strings, in turn, must now be constructed to withstand higher collapse loads, shallow casing strings to handle more robust burst loads. Certain well designs must even feature an intermediate tieback able to endure WCD, where previously a nested liner was sufficient. This confluence of increasingly deep wells and stringent regulations presents challenges. Longer, heavier casing/landing strings push the limits of existing tubular tensile capacity, but as important, they also raise concerns about handling equipment possibly crushing landing strings due to excessive radial load (slip crush). In response, since the mid-80s, a research and testing program has been analyzing and quantifying specific factors involved when crushing loads affect tubular goods failure. Some of the identified causatives behind these increased tubular stresses are handling equipment design, vessel heave-induced dynamic loading, dynamic loading during tripping, and handling equipment-related slip crush loading. A detailed analysis of the mechanics of slip crush revealed modifying certain parameters has a material effect on the radial load imparted onto the pipe by the slips. The research shows that modifying and optimizing the combination of these parameters can not only lead to the design of handling equipment with higher slip crush capacities, but it also leads to the development of a comprehensive model that can more accurately predict the failure of tubular goods due to slip crush.
重型套管柱下入时滑裂的详细机理研究
在过去的50年里,石油和天然气行业一直在推动勘探的极限,乘着最近技术进步的浪潮,开拓全球超深水区域。然而,直到20世纪80年代初,运营商才开始深入到盐层下面,进入墨西哥湾的威尔科克斯等储量。这种盐下(或盐下)趋势将井的深度扩展到超过30,000 ft MD,在水深超过10,000 ft的情况下,需要更长、更重的套管/下放管柱。与此同时,新的政府法规开始要求油井设计能够承受最坏情况排放(WCD)。更深的套管柱必须能够承受更高的坍塌载荷,而浅的套管柱则必须能够承受更强的爆裂载荷。某些井的设计甚至必须采用能够承受WCD的中间回接,而以前嵌套尾管就足够了。越来越深的井和严格的法规的结合带来了挑战。更长、更重的套管/着陆管柱将现有管柱的抗拉能力推到了极限,但同样重要的是,它们也引起了人们的担忧,即由于过度的径向载荷(滑动挤压),搬运设备可能会压碎着陆管柱。因此,自80年代中期以来,一项研究和测试计划一直在分析和量化破碎载荷影响管状货物失效时涉及的具体因素。造成管状压力增加的原因包括处理设备的设计、船舶起下钻时的动载荷、起下钻时的动载荷以及处理设备相关的滑压载荷。对卡瓦挤压力学的详细分析表明,改变某些参数会对卡瓦传递给管道的径向载荷产生实质性影响。研究表明,对这些参数的组合进行修改和优化,不仅可以设计出具有更高打滑破碎能力的搬运设备,而且可以建立更准确地预测管状货物打滑破碎失效的综合模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信