Parametric estimation and inference

M. Edge
{"title":"Parametric estimation and inference","authors":"M. Edge","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198827627.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If it is reasonable to assume that the data are generated by a fully parametric model, then maximum-likelihood approaches to estimation and inference have many appealing properties. Maximum-likelihood estimators are obtained by identifying parameters that maximize the likelihood function, which can be done using calculus or using numerical approaches. Such estimators are consistent, and if the costs of errors in estimation are described by a squared-error loss function, then they are also efficient compared with their consistent competitors. The sampling variance of a maximum-likelihood estimate can be estimated in various ways. As always, one possibility is the bootstrap. In many models, the variance of the maximum-likelihood estimator can be derived directly once its form is known. A third approach is to rely on general properties of maximum-likelihood estimators and use the Fisher information. Similarly, there are many ways to test hypotheses about parameters estimated by maximum likelihood. This chapter discusses the Wald test, which relies on the fact that the sampling distribution of maximum-likelihood estimators is normal in large samples, and the likelihood-ratio test, which is a general approach for testing hypotheses relating nested pairs of models.","PeriodicalId":192186,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Thinking from Scratch","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Thinking from Scratch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198827627.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If it is reasonable to assume that the data are generated by a fully parametric model, then maximum-likelihood approaches to estimation and inference have many appealing properties. Maximum-likelihood estimators are obtained by identifying parameters that maximize the likelihood function, which can be done using calculus or using numerical approaches. Such estimators are consistent, and if the costs of errors in estimation are described by a squared-error loss function, then they are also efficient compared with their consistent competitors. The sampling variance of a maximum-likelihood estimate can be estimated in various ways. As always, one possibility is the bootstrap. In many models, the variance of the maximum-likelihood estimator can be derived directly once its form is known. A third approach is to rely on general properties of maximum-likelihood estimators and use the Fisher information. Similarly, there are many ways to test hypotheses about parameters estimated by maximum likelihood. This chapter discusses the Wald test, which relies on the fact that the sampling distribution of maximum-likelihood estimators is normal in large samples, and the likelihood-ratio test, which is a general approach for testing hypotheses relating nested pairs of models.
参数估计与推理
如果合理地假设数据是由全参数模型生成的,那么估计和推理的最大似然方法具有许多吸引人的特性。最大似然估计量是通过识别使似然函数最大化的参数获得的,这可以使用微积分或使用数值方法来完成。这样的估计器是一致的,如果估计中的错误代价由误差平方损失函数描述,那么与一致的竞争对手相比,它们也是有效的。最大似然估计的抽样方差可以用各种方法估计。一如既往,一种可能性是自举。在许多模型中,一旦最大似然估计量的形式已知,方差就可以直接推导出来。第三种方法是依靠最大似然估计的一般性质并使用Fisher信息。同样,有许多方法可以检验由最大似然估计的参数的假设。本章讨论了Wald检验,它依赖于在大样本中最大似然估计量的抽样分布是正态的这一事实,以及似然比检验,这是检验与嵌套模型对有关的假设的一般方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信