Appraising Sufism in the Thought of Ibn Taymiyyah and Hasan al-Banna

Ahmed Nafiu Arikewuyo
{"title":"Appraising Sufism in the Thought of Ibn Taymiyyah and Hasan al-Banna","authors":"Ahmed Nafiu Arikewuyo","doi":"10.55831/ajis.v6i3.389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sufism as a religious trend has attracted a lot of scholastic polemics among Muslim scholars. One of the popular critics of Sufism is Ibn Taymiyyah whose thoughts have indelibly influenced the teachings of modern Salafiyyah. In the course of waging war against the propagation of Sufism, modern Salafi scholars have branded counterpart scholars noticed with traces of sympathy for the adherents of mysticism, including Hasan al-Bannᾱ, the founder of Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Against this backdrop, this work examines, with comparative analysis, the thought of Ibn Taymiyyah and Hasan al-Bannᾱ over Islamic mysticism and the mystics. The purpose of the comparative study is to decide whether the two scholars' views regarding the subject are responsible for the disagreement among their adherents. The research is library-based and adopts descriptive and analytic methods. The bulk of the information was gathered from the works of the two scholars, the works on the duo, and relevant materials on the subject. The findings of the research showed that there is no significant difference in the thought of the two scholars over mysticism. However, Al-Bannᾱ contrary to Ibn Taymiyyah had once been a core member of a Sufi Order, the assertion which has since constituted a source of controversy over the proper status of Al-Bannᾱ as either a Sufi adherent or as a fair critic. It recommends further research over the cause of disparity regarding Sufism between Ibn Taymiyyah and modern Salafis.","PeriodicalId":178428,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v6i3.389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sufism as a religious trend has attracted a lot of scholastic polemics among Muslim scholars. One of the popular critics of Sufism is Ibn Taymiyyah whose thoughts have indelibly influenced the teachings of modern Salafiyyah. In the course of waging war against the propagation of Sufism, modern Salafi scholars have branded counterpart scholars noticed with traces of sympathy for the adherents of mysticism, including Hasan al-Bannᾱ, the founder of Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Against this backdrop, this work examines, with comparative analysis, the thought of Ibn Taymiyyah and Hasan al-Bannᾱ over Islamic mysticism and the mystics. The purpose of the comparative study is to decide whether the two scholars' views regarding the subject are responsible for the disagreement among their adherents. The research is library-based and adopts descriptive and analytic methods. The bulk of the information was gathered from the works of the two scholars, the works on the duo, and relevant materials on the subject. The findings of the research showed that there is no significant difference in the thought of the two scholars over mysticism. However, Al-Bannᾱ contrary to Ibn Taymiyyah had once been a core member of a Sufi Order, the assertion which has since constituted a source of controversy over the proper status of Al-Bannᾱ as either a Sufi adherent or as a fair critic. It recommends further research over the cause of disparity regarding Sufism between Ibn Taymiyyah and modern Salafis.
评价伊本·泰米耶和哈桑·班纳思想中的苏菲主义
苏菲主义作为一种宗教思潮在穆斯林学者中引起了许多学术争论。伊本·泰米耶是苏菲派最受欢迎的批评者之一,他的思想对现代萨拉菲亚派的教义产生了不可磨灭的影响。在对苏非主义的传播发动战争的过程中,现代萨拉菲派学者给同行的学者贴上了同情神秘主义追随者的标签,其中包括埃及穆斯林兄弟会的创始人哈桑·班尼。在此背景下,本作品以比较分析的方式考察了伊本·泰米耶和哈桑·班尼对伊斯兰神秘主义和神秘主义者的思想。比较研究的目的是为了确定两位学者对这一主题的看法是否导致了他们的追随者之间的分歧。本研究以图书馆为基础,采用描述和分析的方法。大部分信息收集自两位学者的著作、二人组的著作以及该主题的相关材料。研究结果表明,两位学者对神秘主义的看法并无显著差异。然而,与伊本·泰米耶相反的Al-Bann□曾经是苏菲派的核心成员,这一主张后来成为关于Al-Bann□是苏菲派信徒还是公正批评者的适当地位的争论的根源。它建议进一步研究伊本·泰米耶和现代萨拉菲派之间关于苏菲主义差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信