A Comprehensive Comparison of Commercial Wrist- Worn Trackers in a Young Cohort in a Lab- Environment

Salvatore Tedesco, Marco Sica, Thomas Garbay, J. Barton, B. O’flynn
{"title":"A Comprehensive Comparison of Commercial Wrist- Worn Trackers in a Young Cohort in a Lab- Environment","authors":"Salvatore Tedesco, Marco Sica, Thomas Garbay, J. Barton, B. O’flynn","doi":"10.1109/PERCOMW.2018.8480386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today’s society, the use of watch-based technology is growing steadily and is being used in a wide range of applications and on different aspects of the user’s life, from sport and fitness measurement, to entertainment and healthcare evaluation. Considering the multiple application fields for smartwatch/wristbands and their potential adoption in precision medicine applications, it is thus critical to investigate the performance and accuracy of these devices in different potential scenarios of interest. textbfThis study investigated the performance and accuracy of a variety of commercially available activity trackers as regards the estimation of stepcount, distance, and heart rate in a number of walking/household/sedentary activities typical in everyday life, and recreated in a lab-environment in a study population of young adults. Results show that heart rate and stepcount measurements are accurate but unstandardized activities, such as common domestic or leisure tasks, may cause large errors in some devices. Finally, travelled distance can also represent a quantification challenge when climbing up/downstairs. This preliminary work will support the next phase of the project whose goal is to evaluate elderly subjects in lab- and freeliving environments in an ambient assisted living context.","PeriodicalId":190096,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2018.8480386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In today’s society, the use of watch-based technology is growing steadily and is being used in a wide range of applications and on different aspects of the user’s life, from sport and fitness measurement, to entertainment and healthcare evaluation. Considering the multiple application fields for smartwatch/wristbands and their potential adoption in precision medicine applications, it is thus critical to investigate the performance and accuracy of these devices in different potential scenarios of interest. textbfThis study investigated the performance and accuracy of a variety of commercially available activity trackers as regards the estimation of stepcount, distance, and heart rate in a number of walking/household/sedentary activities typical in everyday life, and recreated in a lab-environment in a study population of young adults. Results show that heart rate and stepcount measurements are accurate but unstandardized activities, such as common domestic or leisure tasks, may cause large errors in some devices. Finally, travelled distance can also represent a quantification challenge when climbing up/downstairs. This preliminary work will support the next phase of the project whose goal is to evaluate elderly subjects in lab- and freeliving environments in an ambient assisted living context.
商用腕带追踪器在实验室环境中对年轻人群的综合比较
在当今社会,基于手表的技术的使用正在稳步增长,并被广泛应用于用户生活的各个方面,从运动和健身测量到娱乐和医疗保健评估。考虑到智能手表/腕带的多个应用领域及其在精准医疗应用中的潜在应用,因此研究这些设备在不同潜在场景中的性能和准确性至关重要。本研究调查了各种市售活动追踪器在日常生活中典型的步行/家庭/久坐活动中估计步数、距离和心率的性能和准确性,并在实验室环境中对年轻人的研究人群进行了重建。结果表明,心率和步数测量是准确的,但不标准化的活动,如常见的家庭或休闲任务,可能会导致一些设备出现很大的误差。最后,在爬上/爬下时,行进距离也可能代表一个量化挑战。这项初步工作将支持该项目的下一阶段,其目标是在实验室和自由生活环境中评估老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信