How Does Public IPR Protection Affect Its Private Counterpart? Copyright and the Firms' Own IPR Protection in a Software Duopoly

Krešimir Žigić, Jiří Střelický, Michael Kúnin
{"title":"How Does Public IPR Protection Affect Its Private Counterpart? Copyright and the Firms' Own IPR Protection in a Software Duopoly","authors":"Krešimir Žigić, Jiří Střelický, Michael Kúnin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2507415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study how the strength of public intellectual property rights (IPR) protection against software piracy (copyright protection) affects private IPR protection (that software developers may themselves undertake to protect their IPR). There are two software developers that offer a product variety of differing (exogenously given) quality and compete in prices for heterogeneous users, who make a choice whether to buy a legal version, use an illegal copy (if they can), or not use a product at all. Using an illegal version violates IPR and is thus punishable when disclosed. If a developer considers the level of piracy as high, he can introduce a form of physical protection for his software or digital product. The main aim of our analysis is to study how the level and the change of public IPR protection affect the pricing and IPR protection strategies of software developers. In particular, we are interested in establishing when the two forms of IPR protection (public and private) are complements to each other, when are they substitutes and when a change in public IPR has no impact on private IPR protection.","PeriodicalId":152078,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Copyright & Trademark (Sub-Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Copyright & Trademark (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2507415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study how the strength of public intellectual property rights (IPR) protection against software piracy (copyright protection) affects private IPR protection (that software developers may themselves undertake to protect their IPR). There are two software developers that offer a product variety of differing (exogenously given) quality and compete in prices for heterogeneous users, who make a choice whether to buy a legal version, use an illegal copy (if they can), or not use a product at all. Using an illegal version violates IPR and is thus punishable when disclosed. If a developer considers the level of piracy as high, he can introduce a form of physical protection for his software or digital product. The main aim of our analysis is to study how the level and the change of public IPR protection affect the pricing and IPR protection strategies of software developers. In particular, we are interested in establishing when the two forms of IPR protection (public and private) are complements to each other, when are they substitutes and when a change in public IPR has no impact on private IPR protection.
公共知识产权保护如何影响私人知识产权保护?软件双头垄断下的版权与企业知识产权保护
我们研究了公共知识产权(IPR)对软件盗版(版权保护)的保护力度如何影响私人知识产权保护(软件开发商可能自己承担保护其知识产权的责任)。有两家软件开发商提供各种不同质量的产品,并在价格上为不同的用户竞争,这些用户可以选择是购买合法版本,使用非法副本(如果可以的话),还是根本不使用产品。使用非法版本侵犯了知识产权,因此在披露时应受到惩罚。如果开发商认为盗版程度很高,他可以为自己的软件或数字产品引入某种形式的物理保护。我们分析的主要目的是研究公共知识产权保护的水平和变化如何影响软件开发商的定价和知识产权保护策略。我们特别感兴趣的是,确定两种形式的知识产权保护(公共和私人)在什么时候是互补的,什么时候是替代的,以及什么时候公共知识产权的变化对私人知识产权保护没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信