Comparative Study of English Proficiency Tests

Yan Chen
{"title":"Comparative Study of English Proficiency Tests","authors":"Yan Chen","doi":"10.36346/sarjall.2019.v01i01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English proficiency test is one of the most authoritative types of language competence test, which can measure English competence of test-takers accurately. The validity and reliability of English proficiency test are relatively authoritative. The results of test are the authentic representation of test-takers’ level. Since English are spread and used widely all over the world, different kinds of English proficiency tests appear rapidly. Recently, College English Test (CET), Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) and International English Language Testing System (IELTS) are representative sample for English proficiency test in China. This dissertation compares CET with TOEFL and IELTS by summarizing their test forms and contents in listening, reading, writing and speaking, and analyzes features and purposes of CET, TOEFL and IELTS. According to the systemic analysis, this dissertation brings up the proper attitude that test-takers should hold for English proficiency test. Meanwhile, the author proposes some effective methods of English study for English proficiency test. The author also makes some rational suggestions for developing college English teaching method and modes of instruction.","PeriodicalId":142956,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Research Journal of Arts, Language and Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Research Journal of Arts, Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjall.2019.v01i01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

English proficiency test is one of the most authoritative types of language competence test, which can measure English competence of test-takers accurately. The validity and reliability of English proficiency test are relatively authoritative. The results of test are the authentic representation of test-takers’ level. Since English are spread and used widely all over the world, different kinds of English proficiency tests appear rapidly. Recently, College English Test (CET), Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) and International English Language Testing System (IELTS) are representative sample for English proficiency test in China. This dissertation compares CET with TOEFL and IELTS by summarizing their test forms and contents in listening, reading, writing and speaking, and analyzes features and purposes of CET, TOEFL and IELTS. According to the systemic analysis, this dissertation brings up the proper attitude that test-takers should hold for English proficiency test. Meanwhile, the author proposes some effective methods of English study for English proficiency test. The author also makes some rational suggestions for developing college English teaching method and modes of instruction.
英语水平测试的比较研究
英语能力测试是最权威的语言能力测试类型之一,它能准确地衡量考生的英语能力。英语水平测试的效度和信度是比较权威的。测试结果是考生水平的真实反映。由于英语在世界范围内广泛传播和使用,各种各样的英语水平测试迅速出现。最近,大学英语考试(CET)、托福(TOEFL)和国际英语语言测试系统(IELTS)是中国英语水平测试的代表性样本。本文通过对托福、雅思在听力、阅读、写作、口语等方面的考试形式和内容的总结,对大学英语、托福、雅思的特点和目的进行了分析。在系统分析的基础上,提出了应试者在英语水平考试中应持的正确态度。同时,作者提出了一些有效的英语学习方法,以适应英语水平考试。笔者还对大学英语教学方法和教学模式的发展提出了一些合理的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信