Calibration of the Floodplain Ecological Response Model

Daniel Tan, J. Teng, B. Croke, T. Iwanaga
{"title":"Calibration of the Floodplain Ecological Response Model","authors":"Daniel Tan, J. Teng, B. Croke, T. Iwanaga","doi":"10.36334/modsim.2023.tan203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The Floodplain Ecological Response Model (FERM) is a conceptual model that takes a time series of spatial flood inundation data as input to model the condition of ecological targets across a floodplain, over time. FERM develops wetting and drying periods (referred to as “spells”) from the flood inundation data for a given grid cell and subsequently fits different preference curves depending on the type of spell. The parametrization of the preference curves is physically based allowing for calibration using expert knowledge or from data. Notably, the preference functions are infinitely differentiable, which reflects the smooth nature of the ecological response. Due to data constraints, daily Leaf Area Index (LAI) data for Eucalyptus lagiflorens (Black Box) was obtained from the WAVES (Zhang and Dawes, 1998) mass and energy balance model as a proxy for condition score from 1928 to 2017 for calibration. WAVES is parametrized using vegetation and soil parameters and requires meteorological data as input. The flood inundation data was taken from the Teng-Vaze-Dutta flood inundation model (TVD) (Teng et al., 2018) which uses gauge-flow timeseries data to model flooding. WAVES was run at three different proximities to the main river channel. Three parametrisations of FERM for Black Box were calibrated for each location. Condition scores calculated from remote sensing data using the method described in Cunningham et al. (2009) were used to validate FERM yearly, from 2009 to 2017 excluding 2011 (data for 2011 was unavailable). The Shuffled Complex Evolution algorithm (SCE-UA) (Duan et al., 1993) was used to calibrate FERM with the Nash Sutcliff Efficiency (NSE) metric. Prior to calibration, LAI values from WAVES (the calibration data) were smoothed with a yearly moving average to remove seasonality. The calibration ran with FERM’s seasonal oscillation amplitude parameter fixed to 0 (calibrated after) whilst all other parameters were free to be optimised. The seasonality removal allowed for faster convergence and better performing resultant parametrisations. Calibration ended with an NSE of approximately 0.55 and a Root Mean Squared Error of 0.14. Incorporating meteorological variables would improve performance but make forecasting significantly more difficult on large timescales. The parametrization for Black Box maintained a correlation coefficient of 0.8 on the validation data, demonstrating the model’s ability to capture spatial and temporal trends. FERM is currently implemented in Python and uses Cython to speed up computation. Consequently, FERM can compute yearly condition scores across the entire floodplain in under 10 minutes and can run 50,000 iterations of the Shuffled Complex Evolution Algorithm at a daily timestep in 45 minutes, both over a 100-year timespan. The speed of calibration presents an improvement on large regression models and executes significantly faster than complex process-based models. Future improvements to the model are possible and will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":390064,"journal":{"name":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.tan203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The Floodplain Ecological Response Model (FERM) is a conceptual model that takes a time series of spatial flood inundation data as input to model the condition of ecological targets across a floodplain, over time. FERM develops wetting and drying periods (referred to as “spells”) from the flood inundation data for a given grid cell and subsequently fits different preference curves depending on the type of spell. The parametrization of the preference curves is physically based allowing for calibration using expert knowledge or from data. Notably, the preference functions are infinitely differentiable, which reflects the smooth nature of the ecological response. Due to data constraints, daily Leaf Area Index (LAI) data for Eucalyptus lagiflorens (Black Box) was obtained from the WAVES (Zhang and Dawes, 1998) mass and energy balance model as a proxy for condition score from 1928 to 2017 for calibration. WAVES is parametrized using vegetation and soil parameters and requires meteorological data as input. The flood inundation data was taken from the Teng-Vaze-Dutta flood inundation model (TVD) (Teng et al., 2018) which uses gauge-flow timeseries data to model flooding. WAVES was run at three different proximities to the main river channel. Three parametrisations of FERM for Black Box were calibrated for each location. Condition scores calculated from remote sensing data using the method described in Cunningham et al. (2009) were used to validate FERM yearly, from 2009 to 2017 excluding 2011 (data for 2011 was unavailable). The Shuffled Complex Evolution algorithm (SCE-UA) (Duan et al., 1993) was used to calibrate FERM with the Nash Sutcliff Efficiency (NSE) metric. Prior to calibration, LAI values from WAVES (the calibration data) were smoothed with a yearly moving average to remove seasonality. The calibration ran with FERM’s seasonal oscillation amplitude parameter fixed to 0 (calibrated after) whilst all other parameters were free to be optimised. The seasonality removal allowed for faster convergence and better performing resultant parametrisations. Calibration ended with an NSE of approximately 0.55 and a Root Mean Squared Error of 0.14. Incorporating meteorological variables would improve performance but make forecasting significantly more difficult on large timescales. The parametrization for Black Box maintained a correlation coefficient of 0.8 on the validation data, demonstrating the model’s ability to capture spatial and temporal trends. FERM is currently implemented in Python and uses Cython to speed up computation. Consequently, FERM can compute yearly condition scores across the entire floodplain in under 10 minutes and can run 50,000 iterations of the Shuffled Complex Evolution Algorithm at a daily timestep in 45 minutes, both over a 100-year timespan. The speed of calibration presents an improvement on large regression models and executes significantly faster than complex process-based models. Future improvements to the model are possible and will be discussed.
河漫滩生态响应模型的校正
洪泛区生态响应模型(FERM)是一个概念模型,它以空间洪水淹没数据的时间序列作为输入,模拟洪泛区生态目标随时间的状况。FERM从给定网格单元的洪水淹没数据中开发出湿润和干燥期(称为“法术”),随后根据法术类型拟合不同的偏好曲线。偏好曲线的参数化是基于物理的,允许使用专家知识或数据进行校准。值得注意的是,偏好函数是无限可微的,这反映了生态响应的平滑性。由于数据的限制,我们使用WAVES (Zhang and Dawes, 1998)质量和能量平衡模型获得了lagiflorens (Black Box)的日叶面积指数(LAI)数据,作为1928 - 2017年条件评分的代理进行校准。WAVES使用植被和土壤参数进行参数化,并需要气象数据作为输入。洪水淹没数据取自Teng- vaze - dutta洪水淹没模型(TVD) (Teng等人,2018),该模型使用计量流量时间序列数据来模拟洪水。WAVES在靠近主要河道的三个不同位置运行。针对每个位置对黑箱FERM的三个参数进行校正。使用Cunningham等人(2009)所描述的方法从遥感数据计算条件得分,从2009年到2017年(不包括2011年)每年验证FERM(2011年的数据不可用)。使用shuffed Complex Evolution algorithm (SCE-UA) (Duan et al., 1993)用Nash Sutcliff Efficiency (NSE)度量来校准FERM。在校准之前,使用年移动平均值对WAVES(校准数据)的LAI值进行平滑处理,以消除季节性因素。校准运行时,FERM的季节性振荡幅度参数固定为0(校准后),而所有其他参数都可以自由优化。季节性去除允许更快的收敛和更好地执行最终参数化。校正结束时,NSE约为0.55,均方根误差为0.14。纳入气象变量将提高性能,但使在大时间尺度上的预测明显更加困难。黑匣子的参数化与验证数据的相关系数保持在0.8,表明该模型能够捕捉时空趋势。FERM目前在Python中实现,并使用Cython来加速计算。因此,FERM可以在10分钟内计算出整个洪泛平原的年度条件得分,并且可以在45分钟内以每天的时间步长运行50,000次Shuffled Complex Evolution Algorithm迭代,两者都超过100年的时间跨度。校正速度在大型回归模型上有了很大的提高,并且比复杂的基于过程的模型执行得快得多。该模型的未来改进是可能的,并将进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信