A Mixed‐Methods, International, Multisite Study to Develop and Validate a Measure of Nurse‐to‐Physician Communication in Simulation

Nursing Education Perspective Pub Date : 2015-11-01 DOI:10.5480/15-1644

Cynthia L. Foronda, Jeanne L Alhusen, C. Budhathoki, M. Lamb, Kim Tinsley, Brent R. Macwilliams, Jessie Daniels, Diana Baptiste, Kathie Kushto Reese, Eric B. Bauman

{"title":"A Mixed‐Methods, International, Multisite Study to Develop and Validate a Measure of Nurse‐to‐Physician Communication in Simulation","authors":"Cynthia L. Foronda, Jeanne L Alhusen, C. Budhathoki, M. Lamb, Kim Tinsley, Brent R. Macwilliams, Jessie Daniels, Diana Baptiste, Kathie Kushto Reese, Eric B. Bauman","doi":"10.5480/15-1644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM This study examined the reliability and validity of the ISBAR Interprofessional Communication Rubric (IICR). BACKGROUND Improving education regarding communication in health care is a global priority. Communication is difficult to measure and no evaluation rubrics were located that uniquely focused on nurse‐to‐physician communication in simulation. METHOD This study used a mixed‐methods design and included five sites. RESULTS The IICR was determined reliable among nurse educator raters (rs = 0.79). The scale was found valid as assessed by nurse and physician experts (content validity index = 0.92). When describing their experience of using the tool, nurse educator raters described three categories: overall acceptability of the tool, ease of use, and perceptions of the importance of communication skills for patient safety. CONCLUSION Teaching and evaluating communication in simulation with a standardized rubric is a research area in need of further exploration and refinement.","PeriodicalId":153271,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Education Perspective","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Education Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5480/15-1644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 25

Abstract

AIM This study examined the reliability and validity of the ISBAR Interprofessional Communication Rubric (IICR). BACKGROUND Improving education regarding communication in health care is a global priority. Communication is difficult to measure and no evaluation rubrics were located that uniquely focused on nurse‐to‐physician communication in simulation. METHOD This study used a mixed‐methods design and included five sites. RESULTS The IICR was determined reliable among nurse educator raters (rs = 0.79). The scale was found valid as assessed by nurse and physician experts (content validity index = 0.92). When describing their experience of using the tool, nurse educator raters described three categories: overall acceptability of the tool, ease of use, and perceptions of the importance of communication skills for patient safety. CONCLUSION Teaching and evaluating communication in simulation with a standardized rubric is a research area in need of further exploration and refinement.

查看原文本刊更多论文

一项混合方法，国际，多地点的研究，以开发和验证护士与医生在模拟中的沟通措施

目的本研究检验ISBAR专业间沟通准则(IICR)的信度和效度。背景:改善卫生保健方面的沟通教育是一项全球优先事项。在模拟中，沟通很难测量，也没有评估标准专门针对护士与医生之间的沟通。方法本研究采用混合方法设计，包括5个试验点。结果IICR在护理教育者评分者中是可靠的(rs = 0.79)。经护士和医师专家评估，量表有效(内容效度指数= 0.92)。当描述他们使用工具的经验时，护士教育评分者描述了三个类别:工具的总体可接受性、易用性和对沟通技巧对患者安全重要性的认识。结论模拟交际教学与评价的标准化标准是一个需要进一步探索和完善的研究领域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Nursing Education Perspective

自引率

0.00%

发文量