The conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture and emerging biotechnologies.

C. Mba, H. Dreyer
{"title":"The conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture and emerging biotechnologies.","authors":"C. Mba, H. Dreyer","doi":"10.1079/9781789249095.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n The 50% increase in food production required to feed an ever-growing global population, and which must be attained under dire climate change scenarios and other constraints, will not be attained with a 'business as usual' mindset. For crops, the current cultivars will have to be replaced by ones that are more nutritious, stress tolerant and input-use efficient and that would produce higher yields with less external input. Generating such varieties requires significant efficiency enhancements to the conservation and characterization of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture and their use in plant breeding. Genome editing holds great promise in this regard. Its rapid adoption as a relatively cheap and rapid means to generate precise and predictable heritable variations and its universal applicability mirror the developments of the closely associated gene drive. Large amounts of digital sequence data are also increasingly available, while the field of synthetic biology has been expanding rapidly. This all holds great promise for improving and broadening the genetic base of crop varieties for the enhancement of crop productivity without damaging the environment. However, the pace of the scientific and technological developments for these methods has far outstripped that of the requisite policy regimes. The demonstrable potentials notwithstanding, the developments have not been universally accepted. The ongoing debates include whether the products of genome editing, with or without gene drive, should be considered living modified organisms and, if so, subject to the international framework, the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Another debate is whether digital sequence information should be subject to some access- and-benefit sharing regime, considering that, with the power of synthetic biology, products previously harnessed only from living organisms can now be produced in the laboratory once the DNA sequence is available. There are also debates about ethics. In order to avoid the mistakes of the past, a call is made for evidence-based multi-stakeholder (including especially intergovernmental) dialogues on the safety, fairness and ethics of the use of these emerging biotechnologies, as the stakes are extremely high.","PeriodicalId":287197,"journal":{"name":"Mutation breeding, genetic diversity and crop adaptation to climate change","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation breeding, genetic diversity and crop adaptation to climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789249095.0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The 50% increase in food production required to feed an ever-growing global population, and which must be attained under dire climate change scenarios and other constraints, will not be attained with a 'business as usual' mindset. For crops, the current cultivars will have to be replaced by ones that are more nutritious, stress tolerant and input-use efficient and that would produce higher yields with less external input. Generating such varieties requires significant efficiency enhancements to the conservation and characterization of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture and their use in plant breeding. Genome editing holds great promise in this regard. Its rapid adoption as a relatively cheap and rapid means to generate precise and predictable heritable variations and its universal applicability mirror the developments of the closely associated gene drive. Large amounts of digital sequence data are also increasingly available, while the field of synthetic biology has been expanding rapidly. This all holds great promise for improving and broadening the genetic base of crop varieties for the enhancement of crop productivity without damaging the environment. However, the pace of the scientific and technological developments for these methods has far outstripped that of the requisite policy regimes. The demonstrable potentials notwithstanding, the developments have not been universally accepted. The ongoing debates include whether the products of genome editing, with or without gene drive, should be considered living modified organisms and, if so, subject to the international framework, the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Another debate is whether digital sequence information should be subject to some access- and-benefit sharing regime, considering that, with the power of synthetic biology, products previously harnessed only from living organisms can now be produced in the laboratory once the DNA sequence is available. There are also debates about ethics. In order to avoid the mistakes of the past, a call is made for evidence-based multi-stakeholder (including especially intergovernmental) dialogues on the safety, fairness and ethics of the use of these emerging biotechnologies, as the stakes are extremely high.
保护和可持续利用粮食和农业植物遗传资源以及新兴生物技术。
养活不断增长的全球人口所需的粮食产量增长50%,必须在可怕的气候变化情景和其他限制条件下实现,而“一切照旧”的心态是无法实现的。就作物而言,目前的品种将不得不被更有营养、耐受性和投入利用效率更高的品种所取代,这些品种将在较少外部投入的情况下产生更高的产量。培育这类品种需要大大提高粮食和农业植物遗传资源的保存和特性及其在植物育种中的利用的效率。基因组编辑在这方面有很大的希望。它作为一种相对廉价和快速的产生精确和可预测的遗传变异的手段而迅速被采用,它的普遍适用性反映了密切相关的基因驱动的发展。大量的数字序列数据也越来越多,而合成生物学领域也在迅速扩大。所有这些都为改善和扩大作物品种的遗传基础带来了巨大的希望,从而在不破坏环境的情况下提高作物生产力。然而,这些方法的科学和技术发展的速度远远超过了必要的政策制度的速度。尽管有明显的潜力,但这些发展尚未得到普遍接受。正在进行的辩论包括,基因组编辑的产品,无论是否有基因驱动,是否应被视为改性活生物体,如果是,则应受国际框架,即《生物多样性公约卡塔赫纳生物安全议定书》的约束。另一个争论是数字序列信息是否应该服从于某种获取和利益分享制度,考虑到有了合成生物学的力量,一旦DNA序列可用,以前只能从活生物体中利用的产品现在可以在实验室中生产。也有关于道德的争论。为了避免过去的错误,呼吁就使用这些新兴生物技术的安全性、公平性和伦理问题开展以证据为基础的多方利益攸关方(特别是政府间)对话,因为风险极高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信