Enhancing NL Requirements Formalisation Using a Quality Checking Model

Mohamed Osama, Aya Zaki-Ismail, Mohamed Abdelrazek, J. Grundy, Amani S. Ibrahim
{"title":"Enhancing NL Requirements Formalisation Using a Quality Checking Model","authors":"Mohamed Osama, Aya Zaki-Ismail, Mohamed Abdelrazek, J. Grundy, Amani S. Ibrahim","doi":"10.1109/RE51729.2021.00064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The formalisation of natural language (NL) requirements is a challenging problem because NL is inherently vague and imprecise. Existing formalisation approaches only support requirements adhering to specific boilerplates or templates, and are affected by the requirements quality issues. Several quality models are developed to assess the quality of NL requirements. However, they do not focus on the quality issues affecting the formalisability of requirements. Such issues can greatly compromise the operation of complex systems and even lead to catastrophic consequences or loss of life (in case of critical systems). In this paper, we propose a requirements quality checking approach utilising natural language processing (NLP) analysis. The approach assesses the quality of the requirements against a quality model that we developed to enhance the formalisability of NL requirements. We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach by comparing the formalisation efficiency of a recent automatic formalisation technique before and after utilising our approach. The results show an increase of approximately 15% in the F-measure (from 83.8% to 98%).","PeriodicalId":440285,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE51729.2021.00064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The formalisation of natural language (NL) requirements is a challenging problem because NL is inherently vague and imprecise. Existing formalisation approaches only support requirements adhering to specific boilerplates or templates, and are affected by the requirements quality issues. Several quality models are developed to assess the quality of NL requirements. However, they do not focus on the quality issues affecting the formalisability of requirements. Such issues can greatly compromise the operation of complex systems and even lead to catastrophic consequences or loss of life (in case of critical systems). In this paper, we propose a requirements quality checking approach utilising natural language processing (NLP) analysis. The approach assesses the quality of the requirements against a quality model that we developed to enhance the formalisability of NL requirements. We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach by comparing the formalisation efficiency of a recent automatic formalisation technique before and after utilising our approach. The results show an increase of approximately 15% in the F-measure (from 83.8% to 98%).
使用质量检查模型增强NL需求的形式化
自然语言(NL)需求的形式化是一个具有挑战性的问题,因为自然语言本身是模糊和不精确的。现有的形式化方法只支持遵循特定样板或模板的需求,并且受到需求质量问题的影响。开发了几个质量模型来评估NL需求的质量。然而,它们并不关注影响需求可形式化的质量问题。这些问题会极大地影响复杂系统的运行,甚至导致灾难性的后果或生命损失(在关键系统的情况下)。在本文中,我们提出了一种利用自然语言处理(NLP)分析的需求质量检查方法。该方法根据我们开发的质量模型来评估需求的质量,以增强NL需求的形式化。我们通过比较最近的自动形式化技术在使用我们的方法之前和之后的形式化效率来评估我们方法的有效性。结果显示,f度量增加了大约15%(从83.8%增加到98%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信