The Study of Russian-Chinese Problems of Border Delimitation in the Late 17th - Early 18th Centuries by the Head of the Academic Squad G.F. Miller

D. Bespalko
{"title":"The Study of Russian-Chinese Problems of Border Delimitation in the Late 17th - Early 18th Centuries by the Head of the Academic Squad G.F. Miller","authors":"D. Bespalko","doi":"10.17150/2587-7445.2019.3(3).32-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reviews the first attempts of combined approach to the study of cross-border problems that came to a head between Russia and China in the end of the 17th — beginning of 18th centuries by head of the academic detachment G.F. Miller.\nThe relations of the two states in the designated period of time were quite complex and intense. Conditions for the development of normal political and economic ties, exchange of cultural and historical experience as such did not exist. The Chinese side traditionally considered its neighbors «uneducated barbarians» and did not seek to find good neighborly points of support. The Russian state did not have sufficient forces to fully integrate the eastern frontiers and implement active policies of integrating the south-eastern territories into its sphere of influence, still tried to expand into Transbaikalia, the Amur region and further on in the Far East. By founding new fortresses, barracks, and border posts in the 17th century Russia created the most important strategic base to move to the east, which China attempted to prevent in the strongest possible terms.\nThis confrontation turned into a local-regional conflict with subsequent military confrontation and the emergence of a top-priority problem in the form of the Amur issue with mutual territorial claims. The head of the academic detachment GF Miller studied the nuances and tried to solve the regional problem theoretically. The researcher carefully examined a huge number of different sources and wrote a number of works. The conclusions he presented, however, were perceived by contemporaries ambiguously and in most cases did not find practical implementation. Nevertheless, G.F. Miller was the first scientist who consistently tried to understand the conflicts of the border armed conflict between the Russian and the Chinese state at the turn of the 17th — 18th centuries.","PeriodicalId":143633,"journal":{"name":"Russian and Chinese Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian and Chinese Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17150/2587-7445.2019.3(3).32-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article reviews the first attempts of combined approach to the study of cross-border problems that came to a head between Russia and China in the end of the 17th — beginning of 18th centuries by head of the academic detachment G.F. Miller. The relations of the two states in the designated period of time were quite complex and intense. Conditions for the development of normal political and economic ties, exchange of cultural and historical experience as such did not exist. The Chinese side traditionally considered its neighbors «uneducated barbarians» and did not seek to find good neighborly points of support. The Russian state did not have sufficient forces to fully integrate the eastern frontiers and implement active policies of integrating the south-eastern territories into its sphere of influence, still tried to expand into Transbaikalia, the Amur region and further on in the Far East. By founding new fortresses, barracks, and border posts in the 17th century Russia created the most important strategic base to move to the east, which China attempted to prevent in the strongest possible terms. This confrontation turned into a local-regional conflict with subsequent military confrontation and the emergence of a top-priority problem in the form of the Amur issue with mutual territorial claims. The head of the academic detachment GF Miller studied the nuances and tried to solve the regional problem theoretically. The researcher carefully examined a huge number of different sources and wrote a number of works. The conclusions he presented, however, were perceived by contemporaries ambiguously and in most cases did not find practical implementation. Nevertheless, G.F. Miller was the first scientist who consistently tried to understand the conflicts of the border armed conflict between the Russian and the Chinese state at the turn of the 17th — 18th centuries.
《17世纪末至18世纪初俄中边界划界问题研究》学术小组组长G.F.米勒著
本文回顾了17世纪末至18世纪初,由学术支队队长G.F.米勒首次尝试用联合方法来研究俄罗斯和中国之间的跨境问题。两国在特定时期的关系相当复杂和紧张。发展正常的政治和经济关系、交流文化和历史经验的条件并不存在。中国传统上认为其邻国是“未受教育的野蛮人”,并没有寻求寻找好邻居的支持。俄罗斯国家没有足够的力量来完全整合东部边界,并实施积极的政策,将东南部领土纳入其势力范围,但仍试图向外贝加尔、阿穆尔河地区和远东进一步扩张。通过在17世纪建立新的堡垒,兵营和边境哨所,俄罗斯创造了向东方移动的最重要的战略基地,中国试图以最强烈的方式阻止它。这种对抗变成了地方-区域冲突,随后发生了军事对抗,并出现了一个最优先的问题,即阿穆尔河问题和相互的领土要求。学术支队队长GF Miller研究了其中的细微差别,并试图从理论上解决区域问题。研究人员仔细研究了大量不同的资料来源,并撰写了许多作品。然而,他提出的结论被同时代人模糊地理解,而且在大多数情况下没有得到实际执行。然而,G.F.米勒是第一个一直试图理解17 - 18世纪之交俄罗斯和中国之间的边境武装冲突的科学家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信