Assessing the comprehension of the students in Philippine fable short stories: Basis for an intervention program

Rose Marie Federe, Hazel Gomonid, Jean José, G. Genelza
{"title":"Assessing the comprehension of the students in Philippine fable short stories: Basis for an intervention program","authors":"Rose Marie Federe, Hazel Gomonid, Jean José, G. Genelza","doi":"10.57040/jllls.v3i1.336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading is particularly challenging because there are so many factors to consider. However, some studies show that there are ways to support readers in improving their reading abilities. This study tested students' comprehension of short stories based on Philippine fables. Background knowledge, active reading skills, critical thinking, intense reading, reading background, story comprehension, the impact of short stories, and the use of short stories in language learning are all indications of reading comprehension. A quantitative, non-experimental Intervention Program was used in this investigation. For first- through fourth-year English education majors, researchers identify 402 respondents. There are 80 items total in the questionnaire, 10 for each indication. According to the results, Active reading and Reading background had the highest mean of 2 for reading comprehension. On the other hand, story comprehension scored the lowest mean of 6 for reading comprehension. According to the data, pupils struggle, especially with reading. Researchers developed an intervention program to gauge students' reading comprehension (Action Plan on Reading Intervention for Struggling Students). This can assess their reading abilities and help them to be good readers.\n ","PeriodicalId":108341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Languages, Linguistics and Literary Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Languages, Linguistics and Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57040/jllls.v3i1.336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading is particularly challenging because there are so many factors to consider. However, some studies show that there are ways to support readers in improving their reading abilities. This study tested students' comprehension of short stories based on Philippine fables. Background knowledge, active reading skills, critical thinking, intense reading, reading background, story comprehension, the impact of short stories, and the use of short stories in language learning are all indications of reading comprehension. A quantitative, non-experimental Intervention Program was used in this investigation. For first- through fourth-year English education majors, researchers identify 402 respondents. There are 80 items total in the questionnaire, 10 for each indication. According to the results, Active reading and Reading background had the highest mean of 2 for reading comprehension. On the other hand, story comprehension scored the lowest mean of 6 for reading comprehension. According to the data, pupils struggle, especially with reading. Researchers developed an intervention program to gauge students' reading comprehension (Action Plan on Reading Intervention for Struggling Students). This can assess their reading abilities and help them to be good readers.  
评估学生对菲律宾寓言短篇故事的理解:干预计划的基础
阅读尤其具有挑战性,因为要考虑的因素太多了。然而,一些研究表明,有一些方法可以帮助读者提高阅读能力。本研究测试学生对菲律宾寓言故事的理解能力。背景知识、积极的阅读技巧、批判性思维、精读、阅读背景、故事理解、短篇小说的影响以及短篇小说在语言学习中的应用都是阅读理解的标志。本研究采用定量的、非实验性的干预方案。在一至四年级英语教育专业的学生中,研究人员确定了402名受访者。问卷共80项,每项10项。结果显示,积极阅读和阅读背景在阅读理解方面的平均分最高。另一方面,故事理解在阅读理解中得分最低,只有6分。数据显示,学生们很挣扎,尤其是在阅读方面。研究人员制定了一项干预计划来衡量学生的阅读理解能力(《阅读干预行动计划》)。这可以评估他们的阅读能力,帮助他们成为优秀的读者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信