Use of Non-functional Requirements in Software Effort Estimation: Systematic Review and Experimental Results

S. Silva, Mario C�rtes
{"title":"Use of Non-functional Requirements in Software Effort Estimation: Systematic Review and Experimental Results","authors":"S. Silva, Mario C�rtes","doi":"10.1109/CONISOFT.2017.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software effort estimation is a critical step in software project management, and its main driver are requirements. Some algorithmic methods use as inputs only functional requirements and others take also into account non-functional requirements. The goal of this study is to understand the correlation of using non-functional requirements on the accuracy of software effort estimation algorithmic methods. A systematic literature review was conducted to learn which non-functional requirements are used, how they are used, and their effects on estimation accuracy. The systematic review shows that only 33% of 39 algorithmic methods use non-functional requirements. However, the investigation on its correlation with estimation accuracy was not conclusive from published results. In order to address this issue, a quasi-experiment was conducted on publicly available datasets. This experiment shows that the use of non-functional requirements results in a reduction of about 30% in the estimation error, with statistically significant confidence.","PeriodicalId":357557,"journal":{"name":"2017 5th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 5th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONISOFT.2017.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Software effort estimation is a critical step in software project management, and its main driver are requirements. Some algorithmic methods use as inputs only functional requirements and others take also into account non-functional requirements. The goal of this study is to understand the correlation of using non-functional requirements on the accuracy of software effort estimation algorithmic methods. A systematic literature review was conducted to learn which non-functional requirements are used, how they are used, and their effects on estimation accuracy. The systematic review shows that only 33% of 39 algorithmic methods use non-functional requirements. However, the investigation on its correlation with estimation accuracy was not conclusive from published results. In order to address this issue, a quasi-experiment was conducted on publicly available datasets. This experiment shows that the use of non-functional requirements results in a reduction of about 30% in the estimation error, with statistically significant confidence.
软件工作量评估中非功能需求的使用:系统回顾和实验结果
软件工作量评估是软件项目管理中的一个关键步骤,其主要驱动力是需求。一些算法方法只使用功能需求作为输入,而其他算法方法也会考虑非功能需求。本研究的目的是了解使用非功能需求与软件工作量估计算法方法的准确性之间的相关性。进行了系统的文献回顾,以了解使用了哪些非功能需求,如何使用它们,以及它们对评估准确性的影响。系统回顾显示39种算法方法中只有33%使用非功能需求。然而,从已发表的研究结果来看,其与估计精度的相关性研究尚无定论。为了解决这个问题,在公开可用的数据集上进行了准实验。这个实验表明,使用非功能需求导致估计误差减少了大约30%,具有统计上显著的置信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信