THE 2300, 1260, 1290, AND 1335 DAYS IN DANIEL AND THEIR LITERAL FULFILMENT DURING THE MACCABEAN WAR

Hannington Gitonga Ngai
{"title":"THE 2300, 1260, 1290, AND 1335 DAYS IN DANIEL AND THEIR LITERAL FULFILMENT DURING THE MACCABEAN WAR","authors":"Hannington Gitonga Ngai","doi":"10.54513/bsj.2023.5102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2300, 1290, 1335, and the supposed 1260 days in Daniel have received varied reckonings depending on the interpretation method to which one subscribes. The current study examines the direct speech of the angel speaking to Daniel and, based on these words, tries to investigate whether there might be possible interpretation errors in the existing popular interpretative views. To do this, the study examines and derives meaning from the direct speech of the angel himself. The research findings show that the ‘1260’ and the 1290 days are actually two versions of one and the same dispensation (running from around 167 BC when the temple was defiled by Antiochus (IV) Epiphanes-163 BC when Antiochus died). Just like the ‘1260’ and the 1290 days, the 1335 days also start around 167 BC and end in 163 BC. Finally, the 2300 days start from the murder of Onias III in 171 BC to the cleansing of the sanctuary by Judas Maccabeus in 164 BC. Thus, a keen analysis of the angel’s actual words will reveal that these days actually concerned precise timings on particular future events that were to transpire during the fierce Maccabean war between the Jews and the Seleucids, meaning they were to be literal not prophetic/symbolic days.","PeriodicalId":373844,"journal":{"name":"BIBLICAL STUDIES JOURNAL","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BIBLICAL STUDIES JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54513/bsj.2023.5102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2300, 1290, 1335, and the supposed 1260 days in Daniel have received varied reckonings depending on the interpretation method to which one subscribes. The current study examines the direct speech of the angel speaking to Daniel and, based on these words, tries to investigate whether there might be possible interpretation errors in the existing popular interpretative views. To do this, the study examines and derives meaning from the direct speech of the angel himself. The research findings show that the ‘1260’ and the 1290 days are actually two versions of one and the same dispensation (running from around 167 BC when the temple was defiled by Antiochus (IV) Epiphanes-163 BC when Antiochus died). Just like the ‘1260’ and the 1290 days, the 1335 days also start around 167 BC and end in 163 BC. Finally, the 2300 days start from the murder of Onias III in 171 BC to the cleansing of the sanctuary by Judas Maccabeus in 164 BC. Thus, a keen analysis of the angel’s actual words will reveal that these days actually concerned precise timings on particular future events that were to transpire during the fierce Maccabean war between the Jews and the Seleucids, meaning they were to be literal not prophetic/symbolic days.
但以理书中的2300日、1260日、1290日和1335日,以及它们在马加比战争中字面上的应验
但以理书中的2300日、1290日、1335日和所谓的1260日,根据不同的解释方法而有不同的计算方法。本研究考察了天使对但以理说话的直接言语,并以此为基础,试图探究在现有的流行解释观点中是否可能存在解释错误。为了做到这一点,该研究从天使自己的直接讲话中进行了检查并得出了意义。研究结果表明,“1260”和“1290”实际上是同一个时代的两个版本(从公元前167年神庙被安条克(四世)主显法尼玷污到公元前163年安条克去世)。就像“1260”和“1290”一样,1335天也开始于公元前167年,结束于公元前163年。最后,2300天从公元前171年奥尼亚三世被谋杀开始,到公元前164年犹大·马加比清洗圣殿。因此,对天使实际话语的敏锐分析将揭示,这些日子实际上是关于犹太人和塞琉古之间激烈的马加比战争期间发生的特定未来事件的精确时间,这意味着它们是字面上的而不是预言/象征性的日子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信