MEMES AS MARKERS OF FAKES AND PROPAGANDA TOPICS IN MEDIA REPRESENTATIONS OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN CONFLICT

L. Pavlyuk
{"title":"MEMES AS MARKERS OF FAKES AND PROPAGANDA TOPICS IN MEDIA REPRESENTATIONS OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN CONFLICT","authors":"L. Pavlyuk","doi":"10.23939/SJS2019.01.087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with memes as expressive rhetorical resource in media representations of the Russian-Ukrainian hybrid war and military conflict. It explores textual slogans of Russian propaganda that serve to legitimize external aggression. When these units are mirrored as intertextual material in the Ukrainian counter-discourse, they become critical targets for deconstructing fakes and decontamination of manipulative programs. The network of memetic signs is subordinated to the task of symbolic identification of conflict sides and their objectives. Thematic groups of memes, referring to the scenario of military confrontation, reproduce senses of the main “battles for meaning” and the key narratives of the Russian-Ukrainian information warfare. The memetic markers give an opportunity to analyze such basic strategies of Russian propaganda as justification of aggression through appeal to historical myths, falsification of the meaning of the conflict and programs aimed at the protection of Ukraine’s sovereignty, concealment of facts about the real perpetrators of aggression and origin of weapons, and spread of the threat formulas for intimidation of potential partners. І n the counter-discourse of Ukrainian media, fragments of the speech referring to the opposite side in ideological and military confrontation are presented with the accompaniment of figurative and factual means of distancing and rejection. The reconstructive strategies of Ukrainian media in relation to propaganda formulas are based on the use of factual information, in particular personal stories told by witnesses of events, investigative material, statistical data, and documents. The counter-frames, or interpretive frameworks of the Ukrainian mass media, work to substantially deny primary content of the propaganda “source”. also explains the for understanding of the as interstate opposed to one. The aim at demonstrating that Checking and state","PeriodicalId":249733,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series: Journalistic sciences","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series: Journalistic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/SJS2019.01.087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article deals with memes as expressive rhetorical resource in media representations of the Russian-Ukrainian hybrid war and military conflict. It explores textual slogans of Russian propaganda that serve to legitimize external aggression. When these units are mirrored as intertextual material in the Ukrainian counter-discourse, they become critical targets for deconstructing fakes and decontamination of manipulative programs. The network of memetic signs is subordinated to the task of symbolic identification of conflict sides and their objectives. Thematic groups of memes, referring to the scenario of military confrontation, reproduce senses of the main “battles for meaning” and the key narratives of the Russian-Ukrainian information warfare. The memetic markers give an opportunity to analyze such basic strategies of Russian propaganda as justification of aggression through appeal to historical myths, falsification of the meaning of the conflict and programs aimed at the protection of Ukraine’s sovereignty, concealment of facts about the real perpetrators of aggression and origin of weapons, and spread of the threat formulas for intimidation of potential partners. І n the counter-discourse of Ukrainian media, fragments of the speech referring to the opposite side in ideological and military confrontation are presented with the accompaniment of figurative and factual means of distancing and rejection. The reconstructive strategies of Ukrainian media in relation to propaganda formulas are based on the use of factual information, in particular personal stories told by witnesses of events, investigative material, statistical data, and documents. The counter-frames, or interpretive frameworks of the Ukrainian mass media, work to substantially deny primary content of the propaganda “source”. also explains the for understanding of the as interstate opposed to one. The aim at demonstrating that Checking and state
米姆在媒体对俄乌冲突的表述中作为虚假和宣传话题的标记
本文探讨了在俄乌混合战争和军事冲突的媒体表述中,模因作为表达性修辞资源的作用。它探讨了俄罗斯宣传中的文本口号,这些口号有助于使外部侵略合法化。当这些单位在乌克兰的反话语中被反映为互文材料时,它们就成为解构虚假和净化操纵程序的关键目标。模因符号网络隶属于冲突双方及其目标的符号识别任务。模因的主题组,指的是军事对抗的场景,再现了主要的“意义之战”的感觉和俄罗斯-乌克兰信息战的关键叙述。模因标记为分析俄罗斯宣传的基本策略提供了机会,如通过诉诸历史神话为侵略辩护,伪造冲突的意义和旨在保护乌克兰主权的计划,隐瞒真正的侵略肇事者和武器来源的事实,以及传播恐吓潜在合作伙伴的威胁公式。І在乌克兰媒体的反话语中,在意识形态和军事对抗中提及对方的演讲片段伴随着距离和拒绝的比喻和事实手段。乌克兰媒体在宣传方式方面的重建策略基于使用事实信息,特别是事件目击者讲述的个人故事、调查材料、统计数据和文件。乌克兰大众传播媒介的反框架或解释框架基本上否认宣传“来源”的主要内容。也解释了对州际公路的理解,而不是州际公路。目的是证明检查和状态
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信