A Proposal for Reforming Group Law in the European Union - Comparative Observations on the Way Forward

P. Böckli, P. Davies, Eilís Ferran, G. Ferrarini, José M. Garrido Garcia, K. Hopt, A. Opalski, Alain Pietrancosta, Markus Roth, Rolf Skog, S. Sołtysiński, J. Winter, Martin Winner, E. Wymeersch
{"title":"A Proposal for Reforming Group Law in the European Union - Comparative Observations on the Way Forward","authors":"P. Böckli, P. Davies, Eilís Ferran, G. Ferrarini, José M. Garrido Garcia, K. Hopt, A. Opalski, Alain Pietrancosta, Markus Roth, Rolf Skog, S. Sołtysiński, J. Winter, Martin Winner, E. Wymeersch","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2849865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legal regime applicable to groups of companies in the European Union has been discussed for many years. National legislations have been adopted in a certain number of member states, and new initiatives are being considered by the European Commission and in academic writing. The central issues in groups of companies is the relationship between the controlling shareholder, often the parent company and the subsidiaries, and the potential for abuse to the detriment of the latter’s minority shareholders and creditors. Several answers have been formulated, going from a duty of the parent to indemnify the subsidiary for the charges imposed by the parent, to the acceptance of these charges provided they result in some benefit to the subsidiary and provided they do not endanger the subsidiary’s solvency. In a third approach, these issues may be solved by other common company law, e.g. on the basis of the unfair prejudice provisions. With respect to shareholder and creditor protection, a comparative analysis concludes that there is no need for additional regulatory safeguards. The present approaches indicate that group relations are often characterised by conflicts of interest. Therefore, it is proposed to develop a standard for dealing with these, especially under the form of Related Party Transactions. The specific conditions for dealing with intragroup related party transactions are submitted for further discussion.","PeriodicalId":309706,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2849865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The legal regime applicable to groups of companies in the European Union has been discussed for many years. National legislations have been adopted in a certain number of member states, and new initiatives are being considered by the European Commission and in academic writing. The central issues in groups of companies is the relationship between the controlling shareholder, often the parent company and the subsidiaries, and the potential for abuse to the detriment of the latter’s minority shareholders and creditors. Several answers have been formulated, going from a duty of the parent to indemnify the subsidiary for the charges imposed by the parent, to the acceptance of these charges provided they result in some benefit to the subsidiary and provided they do not endanger the subsidiary’s solvency. In a third approach, these issues may be solved by other common company law, e.g. on the basis of the unfair prejudice provisions. With respect to shareholder and creditor protection, a comparative analysis concludes that there is no need for additional regulatory safeguards. The present approaches indicate that group relations are often characterised by conflicts of interest. Therefore, it is proposed to develop a standard for dealing with these, especially under the form of Related Party Transactions. The specific conditions for dealing with intragroup related party transactions are submitted for further discussion.
欧盟集团法改革的建议——未来道路的比较观察
适用于欧盟公司集团的法律制度已经讨论了多年。一些成员国已经通过了国家立法,欧洲委员会和学术写作正在考虑新的倡议。公司集团的核心问题是控股股东(通常是母公司和子公司)之间的关系,以及滥用权力损害母公司少数股东和债权人利益的可能性。已经制定了几个答案,从母公司有责任赔偿子公司对母公司征收的费用,到接受这些费用,只要它们给子公司带来一些好处,只要它们不危及子公司的偿付能力。在第三种方法中,这些问题可以通过其他普通公司法来解决,例如根据不公平损害条款。关于股东和债权人的保护,一项比较分析得出的结论是,不需要额外的监管保障。目前的方法表明,群体关系往往具有利益冲突的特点。因此,建议制定一个标准来处理这些问题,特别是在关联交易的形式下。集团内部关联交易处理的具体条件有待进一步讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信