An Approach to Validation of Combined Natural Language and Formal Requirements for Control Systems

M. Trakhtenbrot
{"title":"An Approach to Validation of Combined Natural Language and Formal Requirements for Control Systems","authors":"M. Trakhtenbrot","doi":"10.1109/REW.2019.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a novel approach to validation of behavioral requirements for control systems. A requirement is specified by a natural language pattern and its expression in Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). This way flexibility and understandability of natural language is combined with advantages of formalization that is a basis for various stages of system development, testing and verification. Still, validity of the requirements remains a major challenge. The paper considers application of mutation analysis for capturing of correct behavioral requirements. Generation and exploration of mutants supports a better understanding of requirements, The novelty of the approach is that the suggested mutations are semantic-based, as opposed to the more common syntax-based mutation analysis. A significant advantage of the approach is that it allows to focus only on plausible potential faults in understanding of the required system behavior, and to avoid generation of a vast amount of mutants that are irrelevant to the intended meaning of the requirements. Moreover, in many cases the effect of semantic-based mutations just can not be achieved by usual syntax-based mutations of LTL formulas associated with requirements. The approach is illustrated using a rail cross control example.","PeriodicalId":166923,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REW.2019.00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper presents a novel approach to validation of behavioral requirements for control systems. A requirement is specified by a natural language pattern and its expression in Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). This way flexibility and understandability of natural language is combined with advantages of formalization that is a basis for various stages of system development, testing and verification. Still, validity of the requirements remains a major challenge. The paper considers application of mutation analysis for capturing of correct behavioral requirements. Generation and exploration of mutants supports a better understanding of requirements, The novelty of the approach is that the suggested mutations are semantic-based, as opposed to the more common syntax-based mutation analysis. A significant advantage of the approach is that it allows to focus only on plausible potential faults in understanding of the required system behavior, and to avoid generation of a vast amount of mutants that are irrelevant to the intended meaning of the requirements. Moreover, in many cases the effect of semantic-based mutations just can not be achieved by usual syntax-based mutations of LTL formulas associated with requirements. The approach is illustrated using a rail cross control example.
控制系统中自然语言与形式需求相结合的验证方法
提出了一种新的控制系统行为需求验证方法。需求由自然语言模式及其在线性时序逻辑(LTL)中的表达来指定。这种方式将自然语言的灵活性和可理解性与形式化的优势相结合,形式化是系统开发、测试和验证各个阶段的基础。然而,这些要求的有效性仍然是一个主要的挑战。本文考虑了突变分析在捕获正确行为需求方面的应用。突变的生成和探索支持更好地理解需求。该方法的新颖之处在于,建议的突变是基于语义的,而不是更常见的基于语法的突变分析。该方法的一个重要优点是,它允许在理解所需的系统行为时只关注可能的潜在错误,并避免产生与需求的预期意义无关的大量突变。此外,在许多情况下,基于语义的突变无法通过通常基于语法的与需求相关的LTL公式的突变来实现。用一个轨道交叉控制的例子说明了这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信