Family opinion regarding their presence with the physicians during active cardio-pulmonary resuscitation of their relatives

A. Bshabshe, M. Nadeem, Mohammed A. Bahis, J. Wani, S. Aziz, Z. Sabah, T. Shah
{"title":"Family opinion regarding their presence with the physicians during active cardio-pulmonary resuscitation of their relatives","authors":"A. Bshabshe, M. Nadeem, Mohammed A. Bahis, J. Wani, S. Aziz, Z. Sabah, T. Shah","doi":"10.5742/mejim2020.93796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Family presence during resuscitation has been a controversial topic ever since it was first introduced. Despite claims that it may exaggerate the burden on health care workers, this practice is widely gaining attention and a lot of evidence refutes these claims. In fact, a number of international organizations have supported this practice as being useful and with a positive impact on family members. There is not a lot of research in this area in Saudi Arabia and we conducted this research with this aim. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Southern Region of Saudi Arabia and 1185 subjects were enrolled. After attaining formal consent, a pre-formulated questionnaire, formulated on themes from the literature review, was given to the subjects which addressed some basic questions about their opinions regarding family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Results: Out of the 1,185 respondents, 174 (14.6%) had witnessed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) of their relatives while 85.3% had never done so. This study demonstrated that more than half of the family members (58.9%) expressed a desire to be with their loved ones during resuscitation. While 587 (49.5%) people were concerned their presence in the treatment room may interfere in the medical help being provided to their relative, a slight majority i.e. 598 (50.3%) did not agree with this statement. When asked about the psychological impact of witnessing the CPR of their relative, 54.6% (650) people said it might affect them negatively in the long run while 45% (535) did not feel the same. Moreover, 609 (51.4%) did not feel their presence in the Emergency Room (ER) would help the patient in any way while 48.6% agreed that it may indeed do so. 69.8 % of attendants disagreed that they would interfere with the medical process if they were allowed to be present. Conclusion: This study supports that FPDR has shown promising benefits . Therefore, family members must be offered an option to witness the efforts of the medical team and their wishes must be respected and it is the duty of the health care institutions to facilitate this process . Key words: FPDR, family presence, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR","PeriodicalId":243742,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5742/mejim2020.93796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family presence during resuscitation has been a controversial topic ever since it was first introduced. Despite claims that it may exaggerate the burden on health care workers, this practice is widely gaining attention and a lot of evidence refutes these claims. In fact, a number of international organizations have supported this practice as being useful and with a positive impact on family members. There is not a lot of research in this area in Saudi Arabia and we conducted this research with this aim. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Southern Region of Saudi Arabia and 1185 subjects were enrolled. After attaining formal consent, a pre-formulated questionnaire, formulated on themes from the literature review, was given to the subjects which addressed some basic questions about their opinions regarding family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Results: Out of the 1,185 respondents, 174 (14.6%) had witnessed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) of their relatives while 85.3% had never done so. This study demonstrated that more than half of the family members (58.9%) expressed a desire to be with their loved ones during resuscitation. While 587 (49.5%) people were concerned their presence in the treatment room may interfere in the medical help being provided to their relative, a slight majority i.e. 598 (50.3%) did not agree with this statement. When asked about the psychological impact of witnessing the CPR of their relative, 54.6% (650) people said it might affect them negatively in the long run while 45% (535) did not feel the same. Moreover, 609 (51.4%) did not feel their presence in the Emergency Room (ER) would help the patient in any way while 48.6% agreed that it may indeed do so. 69.8 % of attendants disagreed that they would interfere with the medical process if they were allowed to be present. Conclusion: This study supports that FPDR has shown promising benefits . Therefore, family members must be offered an option to witness the efforts of the medical team and their wishes must be respected and it is the duty of the health care institutions to facilitate this process . Key words: FPDR, family presence, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR
亲属在积极心肺复苏期间与医生同在的家属意见
背景:在复苏期间的家庭存在一直是一个有争议的话题,因为它首次提出。尽管有人声称这可能会夸大卫生保健工作者的负担,但这种做法正受到广泛关注,许多证据驳斥了这些说法。事实上,一些国际组织支持这种做法,认为它是有用的,对家庭成员有积极的影响。在沙特阿拉伯,这方面的研究并不多,我们进行这项研究的目的就是为了这个。方法:这是一项在沙特阿拉伯南部地区进行的横断面研究,纳入了1185名受试者。在获得正式同意后,根据文献综述的主题制定了一份预先制定的问卷,向受试者提供了一些关于他们对心肺复苏期间家人在场的意见的基本问题。结果:1185名调查对象中,174人(14.6%)目睹过亲属实施心肺复苏术,85.3%的人从未实施过。这项研究表明,超过一半的家庭成员(58.9%)表达了在复苏期间与亲人在一起的愿望。虽然587人(49.5%)担心他们在治疗室的存在可能会干扰向其亲属提供的医疗帮助,但略占多数的598人(50.3%)不同意这种说法。当被问及目睹亲人进行心肺复苏术的心理影响时,54.6%(650人)的人表示,从长远来看,这可能会对他们产生负面影响,而45%(535人)的人则没有这种感觉。此外,609人(51.4%)不认为他们在急诊室(ER)的存在会以任何方式帮助病人,而48.6%的人同意它可能确实会这样做。69.8%的医护人员不同意,如果允许他们在场,他们会干扰医疗过程。结论:本研究支持FPDR显示出有希望的益处。因此,必须为家庭成员提供目睹医疗小组工作的选择,必须尊重他们的意愿,卫生保健机构有责任促进这一进程。关键词:FPDR,家庭在场,心肺复苏,心肺复苏术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信