Thinking About Development: The Lived Reality of Globalization

Eleanor M. Godway
{"title":"Thinking About Development: The Lived Reality of Globalization","authors":"Eleanor M. Godway","doi":"10.4018/IJT.2015070101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The case is presented for a more human vision of development which would mean a different attitude to globalization. The philosophy of John Macmurray goes beyond traditional dualism of body and mind and the dialectic of Hegel both of which influence much current theorizing to give priority to action over thinking. He challenges contemporary orthodoxy by emphasizing the personal and thus raises questions about the value of scientific knowledge for solving the problems of globalization. The strategy of writing development \"under erasure\" as introduced by Jacques Derrida emphasizes its problematic status. Thus we do have tools to reflect on what is meant by progress and economics and efficiency, and thus reconsider what we might be doing or destroying if we are trying to impose change on the \"underdeveloped\" of the world. tells us: \"All meaningful knowledge is for the sake of action, and all meaningful action for the sake of friendship\" p. 15. The thinking of Howard Richards and associates, and his account of a specific development project in Chile P.P.H. are offered to illustrate this new way of approaching these issues, as it becomes possible to move away from the impersonal conception of efficiency towards the ultimate value of the personal. Thus we can perhaps come to see our future in terms of what we can do to try to build community community from the local to the global.","PeriodicalId":287069,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Technoethics","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Technoethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.2015070101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The case is presented for a more human vision of development which would mean a different attitude to globalization. The philosophy of John Macmurray goes beyond traditional dualism of body and mind and the dialectic of Hegel both of which influence much current theorizing to give priority to action over thinking. He challenges contemporary orthodoxy by emphasizing the personal and thus raises questions about the value of scientific knowledge for solving the problems of globalization. The strategy of writing development "under erasure" as introduced by Jacques Derrida emphasizes its problematic status. Thus we do have tools to reflect on what is meant by progress and economics and efficiency, and thus reconsider what we might be doing or destroying if we are trying to impose change on the "underdeveloped" of the world. tells us: "All meaningful knowledge is for the sake of action, and all meaningful action for the sake of friendship" p. 15. The thinking of Howard Richards and associates, and his account of a specific development project in Chile P.P.H. are offered to illustrate this new way of approaching these issues, as it becomes possible to move away from the impersonal conception of efficiency towards the ultimate value of the personal. Thus we can perhaps come to see our future in terms of what we can do to try to build community community from the local to the global.
关于发展的思考:全球化的生活现实
提出了一种更人性化的发展观点的理由,这将意味着对全球化采取不同的态度。约翰·麦克默里的哲学超越了传统的身心二元论和黑格尔的辩证法,这两者都对当前的理论产生了很大影响,使行动优先于思考。他通过强调个人来挑战当代的正统观念,从而提出了关于科学知识对解决全球化问题的价值的问题。雅克·德里达提出的“擦除下”的写作发展策略强调了它的问题地位。因此,我们确实有工具来反思进步、经济和效率的含义,从而重新考虑如果我们试图将变革强加给世界上的“不发达”国家,我们可能在做什么或破坏什么。他告诉我们:“一切有意义的知识都是为了行动,一切有意义的行动都是为了友谊。”霍华德·理查兹和他的同事们的想法,以及他对智利P.P.H.的一个具体发展项目的描述,被用来说明这种处理这些问题的新方法,因为它有可能从效率的非个人概念转向个人的最终价值。因此,我们也许可以看到我们的未来,我们可以做些什么来尝试建立社区,从地方到全球的社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信