Taking Offence

Carl Vogel
{"title":"Taking Offence","authors":"Carl Vogel","doi":"10.1109/CogInfoCom50765.2020.9237892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between speakers and addressees, the perception of offensiveness in natural language may diverge distinctly to the potential for divergence of understanding of lexical content. Historically, the perception of offensiveness would be treated as a matter of pragmatics rather than semantics. Here, the semantic nature of offence, in particular, taking offence, even where none was intended, is addressed. A formal account is provided, with semantic composition rules corresponding to interpreter personality types.","PeriodicalId":236400,"journal":{"name":"2020 11th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 11th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom50765.2020.9237892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Between speakers and addressees, the perception of offensiveness in natural language may diverge distinctly to the potential for divergence of understanding of lexical content. Historically, the perception of offensiveness would be treated as a matter of pragmatics rather than semantics. Here, the semantic nature of offence, in particular, taking offence, even where none was intended, is addressed. A formal account is provided, with semantic composition rules corresponding to interpreter personality types.
在犯罪
在说话者和收件人之间,对自然语言中冒犯性的感知可能会出现明显的分歧,从而可能导致对词汇内容的理解出现分歧。从历史上看,对冒犯的感知将被视为语用学问题,而不是语义学问题。在这里,冒犯的语义性质,特别是,采取冒犯,即使没有意图,是解决。提供了一种正式的解释,具有与解释器人格类型相对应的语义构成规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信