The Decline of the U.S. Labor Share Across Sectors

Ivan Mendieta‐Muñoz, C. Rada, Rudiger von Arnim
{"title":"The Decline of the U.S. Labor Share Across Sectors","authors":"Ivan Mendieta‐Muñoz, C. Rada, Rudiger von Arnim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3520716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides novel insights on the changing functional distribution of income in the post– war US economy. We present a Divisia index decomposition of the US labor share (1948–2017) by fourteen sectors. The decomposition method furnishes exact contributions from four components towards aggregate changes of the labor share: sectoral real compensation, sectoral labor productivity, the structure of the economy as measured by employment shares, and the structure of markets as measured by relative prices. Results are presented for the entire period as well as the “golden age” (1948–1979) and a “neoliberal era” (1979–2017), painting a rich and detailed picture of structural changes in the US economy. The manufacturing sector plays a dominant role: despite its continuously falling employment share, growth of real compensation matches that of labor productivity in the early period but falls far behind during the neoliberal era. Further, employment shifts towards stagnant sectors with relatively low real wages and productivity. We discuss these results in the context of Baumol’s and Lewis’s seminal contributions on dual economies. While the cost disease is apparent—employment shifts towards stagnant sectors, their relative prices rise, and the aggregate growth rate (of productivity) decreases—the originally suggested mechanism of upward real wage convergence is muted. The observed changes are instead compatible with a “reverse-Lewis” shift, where stagnant sectors act as a labor surplus sink, and dynamic sector labor experiences slowing real wage growth.","PeriodicalId":176096,"journal":{"name":"Economic History eJournal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3520716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

This paper provides novel insights on the changing functional distribution of income in the post– war US economy. We present a Divisia index decomposition of the US labor share (1948–2017) by fourteen sectors. The decomposition method furnishes exact contributions from four components towards aggregate changes of the labor share: sectoral real compensation, sectoral labor productivity, the structure of the economy as measured by employment shares, and the structure of markets as measured by relative prices. Results are presented for the entire period as well as the “golden age” (1948–1979) and a “neoliberal era” (1979–2017), painting a rich and detailed picture of structural changes in the US economy. The manufacturing sector plays a dominant role: despite its continuously falling employment share, growth of real compensation matches that of labor productivity in the early period but falls far behind during the neoliberal era. Further, employment shifts towards stagnant sectors with relatively low real wages and productivity. We discuss these results in the context of Baumol’s and Lewis’s seminal contributions on dual economies. While the cost disease is apparent—employment shifts towards stagnant sectors, their relative prices rise, and the aggregate growth rate (of productivity) decreases—the originally suggested mechanism of upward real wage convergence is muted. The observed changes are instead compatible with a “reverse-Lewis” shift, where stagnant sectors act as a labor surplus sink, and dynamic sector labor experiences slowing real wage growth.
美国各部门劳动收入占比下降
本文对战后美国经济中收入功能分配的变化提供了新颖的见解。我们对美国劳动收入占比(1948-2017)按14个部门进行了分类指数分解。分解方法提供了四个组成部分对劳动份额总变化的确切贡献:部门实际薪酬、部门劳动生产率、以就业份额衡量的经济结构和以相对价格衡量的市场结构。结果显示了整个时期以及“黄金时代”(1948-1979)和“新自由主义时代”(1979-2017),描绘了美国经济结构变化的丰富而详细的图景。制造业发挥了主导作用:尽管其就业份额持续下降,但实际薪酬的增长在早期与劳动生产率的增长相匹配,但在新自由主义时代却远远落后。此外,就业转向了实际工资和生产率相对较低的停滞行业。我们在鲍莫尔和刘易斯对二元经济的开创性贡献的背景下讨论这些结果。虽然成本病是显而易见的——就业转向停滞行业,相对价格上涨,总增长率(生产率)下降——但最初提出的实际工资上涨趋同机制却被淡化了。相反,观察到的变化与“反向刘易斯”转变是相容的,即停滞的部门充当劳动力剩余汇,而动态部门的劳动力经历了实际工资增长放缓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信