Vaginal Transection Versus Vaginal Entry Cuff Closure Technique Following Elective Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Lesions - A Prospective Comparative Study

Abstract

Background: Total abdominal hysterectomy is most common performed gynaecological operation. There is no standard recommendation or guidelines regarding management of vaginal cuff. This study aimed to determine the advantages and disadvantages of vaginal transection versus vaginal entry technique following elective abdominal hysterectomies for benign lesions. Methodology: This is a comparative study involving 180 women undergoing elective hysterectomy in Sparsh hospital, from 10 Jan 2015 to 10 Jan 2020. Patient was randomized to either transactional vaginal or vagina entry technique of cuff closure. In this, we compare Operating time, length of hospital stays, estimated blood loss, post operative discharge. Vaginal length, vaginal cuff infection and granulation after 6 weeks follow up time. A prospective study on all hysterectomies performed by the single senior surgeon at Sparsh hospital in order to eliminate possible differences in surgical techniques and abilities. Result: We found in this study that operating time, blood loss, post operative discharge from vault is less in transection technique of vaginal cuff closure in comparison to vaginal entry technique. Febrile complain is more in vaginal entry cuff group patients. Hospital stay is long in vaginal entry technique patients. There is no difference in post operative vaginal length in both the techniques. Transection technique is easy to perform.  Conclusion: Transection cuff closure technique is better than vaginal entry technique.