The Liability of the Public Administration Arising from Custody in the Italian Legal System: A Law & Economics Perspective

Enrico Baffi, D. Nardi
{"title":"The Liability of the Public Administration Arising from Custody in the Italian Legal System: A Law & Economics Perspective","authors":"Enrico Baffi, D. Nardi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2796006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we seek to demonstrate that, in the case of the public administration’s liability for the property in its custody, the rule of strict liability which seems to be accepted by the Italian Civil Code can be justified in terms of efficiency only if we are trying to allocate risks in an optimal manner. The strict liability of the public administration can be justified by supposing that it is the best risk bearer. To find solutions that control the level of activity of the injured parties, in the paper we suggest distinguishing between highly utilized property and rarely utilized property. In the first case, a rule of strict liability seems to be a second best solution, while in the second case a rule of fault-based liability is preferable.","PeriodicalId":162065,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Law & Economics: Private Law (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Law & Economics: Private Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2796006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we seek to demonstrate that, in the case of the public administration’s liability for the property in its custody, the rule of strict liability which seems to be accepted by the Italian Civil Code can be justified in terms of efficiency only if we are trying to allocate risks in an optimal manner. The strict liability of the public administration can be justified by supposing that it is the best risk bearer. To find solutions that control the level of activity of the injured parties, in the paper we suggest distinguishing between highly utilized property and rarely utilized property. In the first case, a rule of strict liability seems to be a second best solution, while in the second case a rule of fault-based liability is preferable.
意大利法律体系中因羁押而产生的公共行政责任:一个法律经济学的视角
在本文中,我们试图证明,在公共行政对其保管的财产承担责任的情况下,只有当我们试图以最佳方式分配风险时,意大利民法典似乎接受的严格责任规则才能在效率方面得到证明。假定公共行政部门是最好的风险承担者,就可以证明它的严格责任是合理的。为了找到控制受害方活动水平的解决方案,在本文中,我们建议区分高度利用的财产和很少利用的财产。在第一种情况下,严格责任规则似乎是次优解决方案,而在第二种情况下,基于过错的责任规则更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信