Investigating the Presence of 'Leaky' Accumulation in a Human Evidence Integration Signal

Jessica Dully, David P. McGovern, S. Kelly, R. O’Connell
{"title":"Investigating the Presence of 'Leaky' Accumulation in a Human Evidence Integration Signal","authors":"Jessica Dully, David P. McGovern, S. Kelly, R. O’Connell","doi":"10.32470/ccn.2019.1210-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A feature common across sequential sampling models is that decisions are formed by accumulating sensory information up to an action-triggering bound. Aside from this central ingredient, numerous model variants exist that invoke distinct algorithmic elements and adaptations. A key area of disagreement has been whether decisions are achieved by integrating evidence 'perfectly', without the loss of already obtained information, or whether evidence accumulation is subject to 'leak' whereby older samples of information are discarded or lost as time passes. The present study used EEG to investigate a previously identified signal of human evidence accumulation (the centro-parietal positivity; CPP) for signatures of leak. Twenty-three participants completed a continuous random dot motion task with the goal of detecting periods of coherent upward motion. Within half of these coherent targets, a brief 200ms 'gap' of incoherent motion was inserted. Preliminary analyses indicate that these evidence gaps produced substantial reaction time delays and a corresponding deceleration in the build-up of the CPP. However, initial analyses do not identify a negative CPP slope during the gap which would be diagnostic of leak. Our data do not support the role of leak in evidence accumulation.","PeriodicalId":281121,"journal":{"name":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1210-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A feature common across sequential sampling models is that decisions are formed by accumulating sensory information up to an action-triggering bound. Aside from this central ingredient, numerous model variants exist that invoke distinct algorithmic elements and adaptations. A key area of disagreement has been whether decisions are achieved by integrating evidence 'perfectly', without the loss of already obtained information, or whether evidence accumulation is subject to 'leak' whereby older samples of information are discarded or lost as time passes. The present study used EEG to investigate a previously identified signal of human evidence accumulation (the centro-parietal positivity; CPP) for signatures of leak. Twenty-three participants completed a continuous random dot motion task with the goal of detecting periods of coherent upward motion. Within half of these coherent targets, a brief 200ms 'gap' of incoherent motion was inserted. Preliminary analyses indicate that these evidence gaps produced substantial reaction time delays and a corresponding deceleration in the build-up of the CPP. However, initial analyses do not identify a negative CPP slope during the gap which would be diagnostic of leak. Our data do not support the role of leak in evidence accumulation.
研究人类证据整合信号中“泄漏”积累的存在
顺序抽样模型的一个共同特征是,决策是通过积累感官信息形成的,直到动作触发界限。除了这个核心成分,还有许多模型变体,它们调用了不同的算法元素和适应性。分歧的一个关键领域是,是否通过“完美”整合证据而不丢失已获得的信息来做出决定,或者证据积累是否容易“泄露”,即随着时间的推移,旧的信息样本被丢弃或丢失。本研究使用脑电图研究先前确定的人类证据积累信号(中央-顶叶阳性;CPP)用于泄漏的签名。23名参与者完成了一个连续的随机点运动任务,目的是检测连贯向上运动的周期。在这些相干目标的一半内,插入了一个短暂的200毫秒的非相干运动“间隙”。初步分析表明,这些证据差距产生了大量的反应时间延迟和相应的CPP积累减速。然而,最初的分析并没有确定在间隙期间的负CPP斜率,这将是泄漏的诊断。我们的数据不支持泄密在证据积累中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信