Link Performance Comparison based on Insertion Loss: NRZ, PAM3, PAM4, and ENRZ

2020 IEEE Electrical Design of Advanced Packaging and Systems (EDAPS) Pub Date : 2020-12-14 DOI:10.1109/EDAPS50281.2020.9312903

S. Chen, A. Tajalli

引用次数: 6

Abstract

This work presents a comparative study, analyzing performance of NRZ (Non-Return-to-Zero), PAM4 (Pulse Amplitude Modulation of 4-level), PAM3, and ENRZ (Ensemble NRZ) in terms of sensitivity to channel loss. The advantageous of each signaling scheme based on residual eye opening are being discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于插入损耗的链路性能比较:NRZ、PAM3、PAM4、ENRZ

这项工作提出了一项比较研究，分析了NRZ(不归零)、PAM4(4级脉冲幅度调制)、PAM3和ENRZ(集成NRZ)在通道损耗敏感性方面的性能。讨论了基于残馀睁眼的各种信号方案的优点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

2020 IEEE Electrical Design of Advanced Packaging and Systems (EDAPS)

自引率

0.00%

发文量