Chapter 2: On the Nature of Thinking and Its Composition

S. Rubinstein
{"title":"Chapter 2: On the Nature of Thinking and Its Composition","authors":"S. Rubinstein","doi":"10.1080/10610405.2021.1899664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A psychological study of thinking, of course, depends on the overall psychological theory that is applied. The basic postulate of the psychological theory from which we proceed may be formulated as follows: the primary mode of the existence of the psyche is its existence as a process or activity. Based on this premise, the main subject matter of the psychological study of thinking is thinking as a process, as an activity. This principle is aimed against the conscious or unconscious behaviorist, pragmatic, positivist tendencies that have proliferated lately in psychology and that are manifested in the reduction of a psychological study to a “pure description” of the external course of events without uncovering the internal course of the process that underlies these external facts and leads to them. We strive everywhere to proceed from objectively controlled “external” facts, but we regard the task of a psychological study as also shedding light on the internal conditions and patterns of the hidden process that does not appear in a straightforward way and that leads to them. When we refer to the necessity of shedding light behind the external results on the process that leads to them, we mean the necessity of shedding light on the internal conditions of what takes place in the external course of events and properly correlating external and internal conditions; in other words, we are not talking about some process in general but about a certain understanding of it that is in keeping with the principle of determinism. Therefore, the two fundamental postulates that define our approach to the problem of thinking—the dialectical-materialist principle of determinism and the proposition regarding the process of thinking as the basic subject matter of the psychological study—essentially form a single unit. Every thought process has its own resultant expression in a certain formation (e.g., perception as a process in the perception of an object as an image; or thinking as process in a certain concept). Since any such formation is the result or “product” of the relevant process, it is then","PeriodicalId":308330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2021.1899664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A psychological study of thinking, of course, depends on the overall psychological theory that is applied. The basic postulate of the psychological theory from which we proceed may be formulated as follows: the primary mode of the existence of the psyche is its existence as a process or activity. Based on this premise, the main subject matter of the psychological study of thinking is thinking as a process, as an activity. This principle is aimed against the conscious or unconscious behaviorist, pragmatic, positivist tendencies that have proliferated lately in psychology and that are manifested in the reduction of a psychological study to a “pure description” of the external course of events without uncovering the internal course of the process that underlies these external facts and leads to them. We strive everywhere to proceed from objectively controlled “external” facts, but we regard the task of a psychological study as also shedding light on the internal conditions and patterns of the hidden process that does not appear in a straightforward way and that leads to them. When we refer to the necessity of shedding light behind the external results on the process that leads to them, we mean the necessity of shedding light on the internal conditions of what takes place in the external course of events and properly correlating external and internal conditions; in other words, we are not talking about some process in general but about a certain understanding of it that is in keeping with the principle of determinism. Therefore, the two fundamental postulates that define our approach to the problem of thinking—the dialectical-materialist principle of determinism and the proposition regarding the process of thinking as the basic subject matter of the psychological study—essentially form a single unit. Every thought process has its own resultant expression in a certain formation (e.g., perception as a process in the perception of an object as an image; or thinking as process in a certain concept). Since any such formation is the result or “product” of the relevant process, it is then
第二章:论思维的本质及其构成
当然,对思维的心理学研究依赖于所应用的整体心理学理论。我们所依据的心理学理论的基本假设可以表述如下:心理存在的主要模式是它作为一个过程或活动而存在。基于这一前提,思维心理学研究的主要内容是思维作为一个过程,作为一种活动。这一原则旨在反对有意识或无意识的行为主义、实用主义和实证主义倾向,这些倾向最近在心理学中激增,表现为将心理学研究简化为对事件外部过程的“纯粹描述”,而没有揭示隐藏在这些外部事实背后并导致它们的过程的内部过程。我们在任何地方都力求从客观控制的“外部”事实出发,但我们认为,心理学研究的任务也在于揭示隐藏过程的内部条件和模式,这些过程并不以直接的方式出现,并导致它们。当我们说必须阐明外在结果背后的过程时,我们是指必须阐明外在过程中所发生的事情的内在条件,并把外在条件和内在条件适当地联系起来。换句话说,我们不是在笼统地讨论某个过程,而是在与决定论原则相一致的情况下,对它的某种理解。因此,我们研究思维问题的两个基本前提,即辩证唯物决定论原则和把思维过程作为心理学研究的基本主题的命题,本质上是一个整体。每一个思维过程都有它自己在某种形式中的结果表现(例如,知觉作为一个过程,把一个对象知觉为一个形象;或者将思维作为某一概念的过程)。既然任何这样的形成都是相关过程的结果或“产物”,那么它就是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信