Effects of Antiepileptic Drug Levels on Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Patients Using Pharmacokinetics Approach

M. W. Suryoputri, N. E. Endriastuti, D. L. Ilma
{"title":"Effects of Antiepileptic Drug Levels on Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Patients Using Pharmacokinetics Approach","authors":"M. W. Suryoputri, N. E. Endriastuti, D. L. Ilma","doi":"10.15416/ijcp.2021.10.4.272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The high prevalence of antiepileptic drug use in pediatrics increases the risk of side and toxic effects; therefore, it is necessary to monitor drug levels. Therapeutic drug monitoring is conducted through pharmacokinetics by calculating blood drug levels based on respondents' dose and frequency of therapy. This study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drug levels and the correlation with clinical outcomes using descriptive observational design. Furthermore, the Indonesian Epilepsy Community collected respondents' data from June to July 2020 through online and telephone interviews. Out of the 11 respondents that recieved phenytoin, only 1 (9.09%) was in the therapeutic range (10–20 mg/L), while 10 (90.91%) were outside the therapeutic range (<10mg/L). From the 14 respondents that received phenobarbital, 8 (57.14%) were in the therapeutic range (15–40 mg/L), and 6 (42.86%) were outside the therapeutic range (<15 mg/L and >40 mg/L). From the 47 respondents that received valproic acid, 23 were administered through monotherapy, 7 (30.44%) were in the therapeutic range (50–100 mg/L), and 16 (69.56%) were outside the therapeutic range (<50 mg/L and >100mg/L). Out of the 24 respondents that received valproic acid as monotherapy, 18 (75%) were in the therapeutic range (50–100 mg/L), and 6 (25%) were outside the therapeutic range (<50 mg/L and >100mg/L). The results showed that there was no significant relationship (p>0.05) between drug levels and clinical outcome in respondents treated with either monotherapy or polytherapy of valproic acid. In conclusion, a total of 38 respondents (52.05%) had drugs levels outside the therapeutic range, while 35 (47.95%) had drug levels in the therapeutic range. Furthermore, respondents with drug levels outside the therapeutic range require direct monitoring of antiepileptic drug levels to avoid toxic effects and improve clinical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":351729,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15416/ijcp.2021.10.4.272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high prevalence of antiepileptic drug use in pediatrics increases the risk of side and toxic effects; therefore, it is necessary to monitor drug levels. Therapeutic drug monitoring is conducted through pharmacokinetics by calculating blood drug levels based on respondents' dose and frequency of therapy. This study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drug levels and the correlation with clinical outcomes using descriptive observational design. Furthermore, the Indonesian Epilepsy Community collected respondents' data from June to July 2020 through online and telephone interviews. Out of the 11 respondents that recieved phenytoin, only 1 (9.09%) was in the therapeutic range (10–20 mg/L), while 10 (90.91%) were outside the therapeutic range (<10mg/L). From the 14 respondents that received phenobarbital, 8 (57.14%) were in the therapeutic range (15–40 mg/L), and 6 (42.86%) were outside the therapeutic range (<15 mg/L and >40 mg/L). From the 47 respondents that received valproic acid, 23 were administered through monotherapy, 7 (30.44%) were in the therapeutic range (50–100 mg/L), and 16 (69.56%) were outside the therapeutic range (<50 mg/L and >100mg/L). Out of the 24 respondents that received valproic acid as monotherapy, 18 (75%) were in the therapeutic range (50–100 mg/L), and 6 (25%) were outside the therapeutic range (<50 mg/L and >100mg/L). The results showed that there was no significant relationship (p>0.05) between drug levels and clinical outcome in respondents treated with either monotherapy or polytherapy of valproic acid. In conclusion, a total of 38 respondents (52.05%) had drugs levels outside the therapeutic range, while 35 (47.95%) had drug levels in the therapeutic range. Furthermore, respondents with drug levels outside the therapeutic range require direct monitoring of antiepileptic drug levels to avoid toxic effects and improve clinical outcomes.
应用药代动力学方法研究抗癫痫药物水平对儿科患者临床结局的影响
儿科抗癫痫药物的高流行率增加了副作用和毒副作用的风险;因此,监测药物水平是必要的。治疗药物监测是通过药代动力学,根据应答者的治疗剂量和频率计算血药水平。本研究旨在采用描述性观察设计确定抗癫痫药物水平的药代动力学及其与临床结果的相关性。此外,印度尼西亚癫痫社区通过在线和电话访谈收集了2020年6月至7月受访者的数据。在接受苯妥英治疗的11名受访者中,只有1名(9.09%)在治疗范围(10 - 20 mg/L)内,而10名(90.91%)不在治疗范围(40 mg/L)内。47例接受丙戊酸治疗的患者中,23例采用单药治疗,7例(30.44%)在治疗范围(50 ~ 100mg/L)内,16例(69.56%)不在治疗范围(100mg/L)内。在接受丙戊酸单药治疗的24名应答者中,18名(75%)处于治疗范围(50 - 100mg/L), 6名(25%)超出治疗范围(100mg/L)。结果显示,在接受丙戊酸单药或多药治疗的患者中,药物水平与临床转归无显著相关(p>0.05)。综上所述,38人(52.05%)的药物水平超出了治疗范围,35人(47.95%)的药物水平在治疗范围内。此外,药物水平超出治疗范围的受访者需要直接监测抗癫痫药物水平,以避免毒性作用并改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信