Comparing Apples to Oranges? Doing UX Work across Time and Space

A. Darby, Kineret Ben-Knaan
{"title":"Comparing Apples to Oranges? Doing UX Work across Time and Space","authors":"A. Darby, Kineret Ben-Knaan","doi":"10.29242/lac.2018.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Usability testing is, famously, an iterative process. You test something, you make changes based upon the results, you test again. The recent website redesign process for the University of Miami Libraries began with an extensive “Discovery and Content Analysis” phase, which was the foundation for over a year’s worth of testing across the subsequent stages of the project. Each set of tests was designed to assess and/or improve the performance of specific features of the site and made use of a diverse set of methodologies and tools. While there was no static set of questions or tasks that appeared in all tests, those which performed well were removed from subsequent testing, while those which performed poorly continued on.","PeriodicalId":193553,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29242/lac.2018.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Usability testing is, famously, an iterative process. You test something, you make changes based upon the results, you test again. The recent website redesign process for the University of Miami Libraries began with an extensive “Discovery and Content Analysis” phase, which was the foundation for over a year’s worth of testing across the subsequent stages of the project. Each set of tests was designed to assess and/or improve the performance of specific features of the site and made use of a diverse set of methodologies and tools. While there was no static set of questions or tasks that appeared in all tests, those which performed well were removed from subsequent testing, while those which performed poorly continued on.
比较苹果和橘子?跨时间和空间做用户体验工作
众所周知,可用性测试是一个迭代过程。你测试一些东西,你根据结果做出改变,你再次测试。迈阿密大学图书馆最近的网站重新设计过程始于一个广泛的“发现和内容分析”阶段,这是该项目后续阶段一年多的测试的基础。每组测试的目的是评估和(或)改进网站特定功能的性能,并使用了一套不同的方法和工具。虽然在所有测试中都没有固定的问题或任务集,但那些表现良好的问题或任务将从后续测试中删除,而那些表现不佳的问题或任务将继续进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信