Technological advances: what hope for colorectal cancer?

Boumediene Elhabachi, Mama Sidelmrabet Ben Brahim
{"title":"Technological advances: what hope for colorectal cancer?","authors":"Boumediene Elhabachi, Mama Sidelmrabet Ben Brahim","doi":"10.26415/2572-004X-VOL3ISS1P347-362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Colorectal cancers rank third in all cancers. Mass screening has proven effectiveness by significantly reducing incidence and mortality. If optical colonoscopy is the reference exam, virtual colonoscopy is an alternative of choice. We evaluate its first-line position in screening, following technological progress. \nMethods: We used PubMed's electronic search data from 2010. Among the 100 most consulted articles, have been studied those in English-language and which looked at screening in the population at average risk aged between 50 and 75 years , asymptomatic and dealing with optical and virtual colonoscopy. Studies in the symptomatic, high-risk, or very high-risk population or for diagnostic purposes were excluded. \nResults: in the USA, studies confirm the trend towards a decrease in incidence and mortality by colorectal cancers, shifting from 56.7 per 100,000 and 23.6 deaths respectively in 1992 to 36.5 per 100,000 and 14 deaths in 2015, thanks to the means of screening including the endoscopy. Although optical colonoscopy is the standard exam, virtual colonoscopy, with a specificity of 90% and a sensitivity of 85%, is becoming more and more a first-line means of screening for colorectal cancers. \nConclusion: Thus, first-line endoscopic screening has proved its effectiveness in reducing morbidity and mortality by this cancer. However, the virtual endoscopy chosen by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network as a means of screening will undoubtedly constitute a strategy for the future, particularly in developing countries.","PeriodicalId":397681,"journal":{"name":"Medical Technologies Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Technologies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26415/2572-004X-VOL3ISS1P347-362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancers rank third in all cancers. Mass screening has proven effectiveness by significantly reducing incidence and mortality. If optical colonoscopy is the reference exam, virtual colonoscopy is an alternative of choice. We evaluate its first-line position in screening, following technological progress. Methods: We used PubMed's electronic search data from 2010. Among the 100 most consulted articles, have been studied those in English-language and which looked at screening in the population at average risk aged between 50 and 75 years , asymptomatic and dealing with optical and virtual colonoscopy. Studies in the symptomatic, high-risk, or very high-risk population or for diagnostic purposes were excluded. Results: in the USA, studies confirm the trend towards a decrease in incidence and mortality by colorectal cancers, shifting from 56.7 per 100,000 and 23.6 deaths respectively in 1992 to 36.5 per 100,000 and 14 deaths in 2015, thanks to the means of screening including the endoscopy. Although optical colonoscopy is the standard exam, virtual colonoscopy, with a specificity of 90% and a sensitivity of 85%, is becoming more and more a first-line means of screening for colorectal cancers. Conclusion: Thus, first-line endoscopic screening has proved its effectiveness in reducing morbidity and mortality by this cancer. However, the virtual endoscopy chosen by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network as a means of screening will undoubtedly constitute a strategy for the future, particularly in developing countries.
技术进步:结直肠癌有什么希望?
导读:结直肠癌在所有癌症中排名第三。通过显著降低发病率和死亡率,大规模筛查已证明是有效的。如果光学结肠镜检查是参考检查,虚拟结肠镜检查是另一种选择。随着技术进步,我们评估其在筛选中的一线地位。方法:我们使用PubMed 2010年的电子检索数据。在咨询最多的100篇文章中,研究人员研究了英语文章,这些文章研究了年龄在50至75岁之间、无症状、进行光学和虚拟结肠镜检查的平均风险人群的筛查。排除了有症状、高风险或非常高风险人群或诊断目的的研究。结果:在美国,研究证实结肠直肠癌的发病率和死亡率呈下降趋势,从1992年的每10万人56.7例和23.6例死亡分别下降到2015年的每10万人36.5例和14例死亡,这得益于包括内窥镜检查在内的筛查手段。虽然光学结肠镜检查是标准检查,但虚拟结肠镜检查的特异性为90%,灵敏度为85%,正日益成为结直肠癌筛查的一线手段。结论:一线内镜筛查对降低本癌的发病率和死亡率是有效的。然而,国家综合癌症网络选择的虚拟内窥镜作为一种筛查手段无疑将构成未来的战略,特别是在发展中国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书