History of Illustration by Susan Doyle, Jaleen Grove and Whitney Sherman (review)

Daniel F. Yezbick
{"title":"History of Illustration by Susan Doyle, Jaleen Grove and Whitney Sherman (review)","authors":"Daniel F. Yezbick","doi":"10.1353/ink.2020.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"367 sion of stories and characters that the authors do find promising. Nevertheless, in praising an example of Luke Cage coming into a leadership role in 2005’s the New Avengers, the authors ignore that the policies he used this leadership to enact are an echo of the kind of “broken windows” approach equated with Rudolph Guiliani’s draconian mayorship of New York City—policies that disproportionately targeted communities of color (280–81). This kind of context seems crucial in considering how Cage is written by Brian Michael Bendis in these comics and is a context that scholars like Jonathan W. Gray (and I myself) have already pointed out when writing about them. Truly, it would be too much to ask of any survey like All New, All Different to adequately explore all these interconnected perspectives on race and American superheroes, but nevertheless the book would have been better served to clearly frame its claims that comics “promulgat[e] unique conceptions of race and ethnicity” and “produce attitudes” by spending more time considering who creates those messages, who receives them, and how (14). Ultimately, this incompleteness gives the impression that Austin and Hamilton perceive a very narrow and unsophisticated audience for the comics to which they ascribe so much power.","PeriodicalId":392545,"journal":{"name":"Inks: The Journal of the Comics Studies Society","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inks: The Journal of the Comics Studies Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ink.2020.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

367 sion of stories and characters that the authors do find promising. Nevertheless, in praising an example of Luke Cage coming into a leadership role in 2005’s the New Avengers, the authors ignore that the policies he used this leadership to enact are an echo of the kind of “broken windows” approach equated with Rudolph Guiliani’s draconian mayorship of New York City—policies that disproportionately targeted communities of color (280–81). This kind of context seems crucial in considering how Cage is written by Brian Michael Bendis in these comics and is a context that scholars like Jonathan W. Gray (and I myself) have already pointed out when writing about them. Truly, it would be too much to ask of any survey like All New, All Different to adequately explore all these interconnected perspectives on race and American superheroes, but nevertheless the book would have been better served to clearly frame its claims that comics “promulgat[e] unique conceptions of race and ethnicity” and “produce attitudes” by spending more time considering who creates those messages, who receives them, and how (14). Ultimately, this incompleteness gives the impression that Austin and Hamilton perceive a very narrow and unsophisticated audience for the comics to which they ascribe so much power.
苏珊·道尔、贾琳·格罗夫、惠特尼·谢尔曼《插画史》(书评)
367个故事和人物,作者确实觉得有希望。然而,在赞扬卢克·凯奇在2005年的《新复仇者联盟》中担任领导角色的例子时,作者忽略了他利用这种领导地位制定的政策是一种“破窗”方法的回声,这种方法与鲁道夫·古利安尼(Rudolph giuliani)担任纽约市市长时的严厉政策相当——这些政策不成比例地针对有色社区(280-81)。考虑到布莱恩·迈克尔·本迪斯在这些漫画中是如何塑造凯奇的,这种背景似乎至关重要,乔纳森·w·格雷(和我自己)等学者在撰写这些漫画时已经指出了这种背景。的确,要求任何像《全新,所有不同》这样的调查充分探讨种族和美国超级英雄的所有这些相互关联的观点都是过分的,但无论如何,这本书如果能花更多的时间考虑是谁创造了这些信息,谁接受了这些信息,以及如何接受这些信息,就能更好地阐明漫画“传播种族和民族的独特概念”和“产生态度”的主张。最终,这种不完整性给人的印象是,奥斯丁和汉密尔顿认为漫画的观众非常狭隘和不成熟,而他们认为漫画具有如此大的影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信