Computational Modelling of Probe Configurations for Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy-based Differentiation of Thyroid and Parathyroid Tissues

Malwina Matella, D. Walker, Keith D. Hunter
{"title":"Computational Modelling of Probe Configurations for Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy-based Differentiation of Thyroid and Parathyroid Tissues","authors":"Malwina Matella, D. Walker, Keith D. Hunter","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA57477.2023.10171880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The ZedScan™ probe is an electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) device originally developed as a tool to diagnose Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN), recently explored as a potential tool to distinguish parathyroid glands from the surrounding tissues during surgery [1]. As reported, the relatively large size of the tip of the probe (5.5 mm) can be problematic to accurately cover and measure the impedance of small structures, such as parathyroid glands (3-7 mm). In this study, we will utilise a computational model to quantity the uncertainty associated with the probe misalignment and evaluate the benefits of reducing the size of the probe on thyroid and parathyroid differentiation. Materials and Methods: Multiscale finite element models of thyroid and parathyroid were developed to investigate the impact of the EIS measurement accuracy of various probe-parathyroid misalignment scenarios. Subsequently, the macroscale impedivity of thyroid and parathyroid tissues was simulated with smaller probe configurations to explore the benefits of probe optimisation. Results: The probe misalignment study reported up to 40%, 21% and 26% decrease in low-and high-frequency impedance and impedance frequency, respectively, compared to results with a desirable parathyroid-probe coverage. The decrease in parathyroid impedance brings the results closer to thyroid baseline EIS spectrum, reducing the feasibility of tissues separation. The probe optimisation study reported about 4% increase in parathyroid’s low-frequency impedance, showing a slight improvement in the thyroid and parathyroid differentiation. Conclusions: This study revealed the importance of the accuracy of the EIS measurement with the ZedScan™ device by demonstrating that imprecise parathyroid coverage could result in ‘contaminated’ measurements constraining their differentiation. Moreover, a smaller probe-tip design has the potential to further increase the ease of acquiring accurate parathyroid results, slightly improving the separation between the tissues on the basis of EIS measurements.","PeriodicalId":191927,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA57477.2023.10171880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ZedScan™ probe is an electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) device originally developed as a tool to diagnose Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN), recently explored as a potential tool to distinguish parathyroid glands from the surrounding tissues during surgery [1]. As reported, the relatively large size of the tip of the probe (5.5 mm) can be problematic to accurately cover and measure the impedance of small structures, such as parathyroid glands (3-7 mm). In this study, we will utilise a computational model to quantity the uncertainty associated with the probe misalignment and evaluate the benefits of reducing the size of the probe on thyroid and parathyroid differentiation. Materials and Methods: Multiscale finite element models of thyroid and parathyroid were developed to investigate the impact of the EIS measurement accuracy of various probe-parathyroid misalignment scenarios. Subsequently, the macroscale impedivity of thyroid and parathyroid tissues was simulated with smaller probe configurations to explore the benefits of probe optimisation. Results: The probe misalignment study reported up to 40%, 21% and 26% decrease in low-and high-frequency impedance and impedance frequency, respectively, compared to results with a desirable parathyroid-probe coverage. The decrease in parathyroid impedance brings the results closer to thyroid baseline EIS spectrum, reducing the feasibility of tissues separation. The probe optimisation study reported about 4% increase in parathyroid’s low-frequency impedance, showing a slight improvement in the thyroid and parathyroid differentiation. Conclusions: This study revealed the importance of the accuracy of the EIS measurement with the ZedScan™ device by demonstrating that imprecise parathyroid coverage could result in ‘contaminated’ measurements constraining their differentiation. Moreover, a smaller probe-tip design has the potential to further increase the ease of acquiring accurate parathyroid results, slightly improving the separation between the tissues on the basis of EIS measurements.
基于电阻抗谱的甲状腺和甲状旁腺组织分化探针配置的计算模型
背景:ZedScan™探针是一种电阻抗谱(EIS)设备,最初是作为诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的工具而开发的,最近被探索作为在手术过程中区分甲状旁腺和周围组织的潜在工具。据报道,相对较大的探针尖端尺寸(5.5 mm)可能难以准确覆盖和测量小结构的阻抗,如甲状旁腺(3-7 mm)。在这项研究中,我们将利用一个计算模型来量化与探针错位相关的不确定性,并评估减小探针尺寸对甲状腺和甲状旁腺分化的好处。材料和方法:建立甲状腺和甲状旁腺的多尺度有限元模型,研究各种探针-甲状旁腺错位情况下EIS测量精度的影响。随后,使用较小的探针配置模拟甲状腺和甲状旁腺组织的宏观阻抗,以探索探针优化的好处。结果:与理想的甲状旁腺探针覆盖结果相比,探针错位研究报告的低频和高频阻抗和阻抗频率分别降低了40%,21%和26%。甲状旁腺阻抗的降低使结果更接近甲状腺基线EIS谱,降低了组织分离的可行性。探针优化研究报告甲状旁腺低频阻抗增加约4%,显示甲状腺和甲状旁腺分化略有改善。结论:本研究通过证明不精确的甲状旁腺覆盖可能导致“污染”测量,从而揭示了ZedScan™设备EIS测量准确性的重要性,限制了它们的分化。此外,更小的探针尖端设计有可能进一步增加获得准确甲状旁腺结果的便利性,在EIS测量的基础上略微改善组织之间的分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信