{"title":"THE THERMAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A SOLAR POND COUPLED LOW TEMPERATURE MULTI STAGE DESALINATION PLANT PART II: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS","authors":"K. R. Agha, G. Rice, A. Wheldon","doi":"10.1080/01425910008914360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the thermal performance and economic feasibility of matching the SGSP with the MSF destilation plant with a daily product water output of 1000 m3/day. The analysis are based on the assumption that the solar pond is to be used as the sole heal source (thermal energy) for the distillation plant. The thermal simulation of the MSF desalination process was predicted by using a mathematical model based on stage by stage calculations taking into account the variations in fluid properties and flow conditions. The generated simultaneous equations of the mass and energy balances were combined and arranged in a matrix form and then translated into algorithm to predict process variables such as temperature and flash evaporation rates. The paper discusses optimisation of the size of the pond and the number of stages for three different storage zone temperatures taking into account the large variation in quantity of energy supplied by the pond between summer and winter. One result is that oversizing the pond, leading to some rejection of the heat collected during the summer (which is referred to as peak clipping), will result in a higher utilisation factor of the desalination plant and a reduction in the summer/winter yield ratio. Optimum peak clipping days, leading to the minimum product water cost, for each storage zone temperature and performance ratio is presented. The sensitivity analysis of the various factors affecting the overall water costs show that the capital costs comprise about two thirds (2/3) of the total desalinated water costs. This demonstrates and re-emphasises the inherent and basic fact that solar desalination is a capital intensive enterprise. Each 1% increase in interest rate increases solar pond thermal energy costs by about 13–15% and desalinated water costs from SP/MSF combination by about 10–13%.","PeriodicalId":162029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Solar Energy","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Solar Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01425910008914360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This paper presents the thermal performance and economic feasibility of matching the SGSP with the MSF destilation plant with a daily product water output of 1000 m3/day. The analysis are based on the assumption that the solar pond is to be used as the sole heal source (thermal energy) for the distillation plant. The thermal simulation of the MSF desalination process was predicted by using a mathematical model based on stage by stage calculations taking into account the variations in fluid properties and flow conditions. The generated simultaneous equations of the mass and energy balances were combined and arranged in a matrix form and then translated into algorithm to predict process variables such as temperature and flash evaporation rates. The paper discusses optimisation of the size of the pond and the number of stages for three different storage zone temperatures taking into account the large variation in quantity of energy supplied by the pond between summer and winter. One result is that oversizing the pond, leading to some rejection of the heat collected during the summer (which is referred to as peak clipping), will result in a higher utilisation factor of the desalination plant and a reduction in the summer/winter yield ratio. Optimum peak clipping days, leading to the minimum product water cost, for each storage zone temperature and performance ratio is presented. The sensitivity analysis of the various factors affecting the overall water costs show that the capital costs comprise about two thirds (2/3) of the total desalinated water costs. This demonstrates and re-emphasises the inherent and basic fact that solar desalination is a capital intensive enterprise. Each 1% increase in interest rate increases solar pond thermal energy costs by about 13–15% and desalinated water costs from SP/MSF combination by about 10–13%.