Specifics of Argumentation in Judicial Practice in Ukraine

Volodymyr Kistianyk
{"title":"Specifics of Argumentation in Judicial Practice in Ukraine","authors":"Volodymyr Kistianyk","doi":"10.15804/ksm20200303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to some features of the argumentation contained in decisions of Ukrainian courts. The article describes typical problems that oc-cur during judicial argumentation, which hinder quality of justice. The author analyzes the logical approach to judicial argumentation, argumentation based on principles, the rhetorical approach and inductive as well as deductive argumentation during proceedings in Ukrainian courts. These are some of the most widely used approaches in judicial argumentation. The article provides some recommendations that can improve argumentation in Ukrainian judicial practice. These problems can be solved by improving the level of legal culture, increasing the education of litigants and by using other methods.","PeriodicalId":431204,"journal":{"name":"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/ksm20200303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is devoted to some features of the argumentation contained in decisions of Ukrainian courts. The article describes typical problems that oc-cur during judicial argumentation, which hinder quality of justice. The author analyzes the logical approach to judicial argumentation, argumentation based on principles, the rhetorical approach and inductive as well as deductive argumentation during proceedings in Ukrainian courts. These are some of the most widely used approaches in judicial argumentation. The article provides some recommendations that can improve argumentation in Ukrainian judicial practice. These problems can be solved by improving the level of legal culture, increasing the education of litigants and by using other methods.
乌克兰司法实践中论证的特点
本文主要介绍乌克兰法院判决中论证的一些特点。文章描述了司法论证过程中出现的典型问题,这些问题妨碍了司法质量。作者分析了司法论证的逻辑方法、基于原则的论证、修辞方法以及乌克兰法院诉讼过程中的归纳和演绎论证。这些都是司法论证中使用最广泛的方法。文章就如何改进乌克兰司法实践中的论证提出了一些建议。这些问题可以通过提高法律文化水平、加强对诉讼当事人的教育以及使用其他方法来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信